ArticleJournal of comparative pathology2013
Immunohistochemical characterization of the hepatic progenitor cell compartment in medaka (Oryzias latipes) following hepatic injury.
Article in Journal of comparative pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regeneration in fish, with special focus on killifishes.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2025Review
- Establishment of an Adult Medaka Fatty Liver Model by Administration of a Gubra-Amylin-Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Diet Containing High Levels of Palmitic Acid and Fructose.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Laboratory fish species are used increasingly in biomedical research and are considered robust models for the study of regenerative processes. Studies investigating the response of the fish liver to injury have demonstrated the presence of a ductular reaction and oval-like cells in injured and regenerating liver. To date, however, it is unclear if this cell population is the piscine equivalent of oval cells (OCs) or intermediate hepatobiliary cells (IHBCs) identified in rodents and man, respectively. The present study defines the process of OC differentiation in fish liver using histopathology, immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. To generate OC proliferation in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), hepatic injury was induced by exposure of adult fish to either microcystin LR or dimethylnitrosamine. A transgenic strain of medaka expressing a red fluorescent protein (RFP) exclusively in hepatocytes was used. The morphological response to injury was characterized by a ductular reaction comprised of cytokeratin (CK) AE1/AE3(+) OCs progressing to IHBCs variably positive for CK and RFP and finally mature RFP(+) hepatocytes and CK(+) cholangiocytes. These observations support a bipotential differentiation pathway of fish OCs towards hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. Ultrastructural morphology confirmed the presence of OCs and differentiation towards hepatocytes. These results demonstrated clear similarities between patterns of reaction to injury in fish and mammalian livers. They also confirm the presence of, and support the putative bipotential lineage capabilities of, the fish OC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.