Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23663952›Full record

ReviewLancet (London, England)2013

Bipolar disorder diagnosis: challenges and future directions.

Mary L Phillips, David J Kupfer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04998097 (Changes in Serum miRNA and BDNF Levels in Bipolar II Depression Treated by Theta-burst Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 224 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
224citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04998097 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Changes in Serum miRNA and BDNF Levels in Bipolar II Depression Treated by Theta-burst Stimulation: A Randomized Sham-controlled Exploratory Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsBipolar II Disorder, Most Recent Episode Major DepressiveArmsrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

224 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Lithium for acute mania.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Meta-analysis of the Interval between the Onset and Management of Bipolar Disorder.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2017
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

164 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary L PhillipsDepartment of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. phillipsml@upmc.edu
David J Kupfer

Funding

Children of Bipolar Parents: A High Risk Follow Up Study (also known as Bipolar Offspring Study - BIOS)R01MH060952 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BIRMAHER, BORIS, PHILLIPS, MARY LOUISE · 2001 to 2020
$20.4M
Reward, pathophysiologic dimensions and psychological distress in young adultsR01MH100041 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PHILLIPS, MARY LOUISE · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060952NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar disorder refers to a group of affective disorders, which together are characterised by depressive and manic or hypomanic episodes. These disorders include: bipolar disorder type I (depressive and manic episodes: this disorder can be diagnosed on the basis of one manic episode); bipolar disorder type II (depressive and hypomanic episodes); cyclothymic disorder (hypomanic and depressive symptoms that do not meet criteria for depressive episodes); and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (depressive and hypomanic-like symptoms that do not meet the diagnostic criteria for any of the aforementioned disorders). Bipolar disorder type II is especially difficult to diagnose accurately because of the difficulty in differentiation of this disorder from recurrent unipolar depression (recurrent depressive episodes) in depressed patients. The identification of objective biomarkers that represent pathophysiologic processes that differ between bipolar disorder and unipolar depression can both inform bipolar disorder diagnosis and provide biological targets for the development of new and personalised treatments. Neuroimaging studies could help the identification of biomarkers that differentiate bipolar disorder from unipolar depression, but the problem in detection of a clear boundary between these disorders suggests that they might be better represented as a continuum of affective disorders. Innovative combinations of neuroimaging and pattern recognition approaches can identify individual patterns of neural structure and function that accurately ascertain where a patient might lie on a behavioural scale. Ultimately, an integrative approach, with several biological measurements using different scales, could yield patterns of biomarkers (biosignatures) to help identify biological targets for personalised and new treatments for all affective disorders.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomarkersBipolar DisorderDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDiagnostic ImagingHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23663952
PMCPMC5858935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.