Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23663852›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2013

Parameter importance in FRAP acquisition and analysis: a simulation approach.

Juliane Mai, Saskia Trump, Irina Lehmann, Sabine Attinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliane MaiDepartment of Computational Hydrosystems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany. juliane.mai@ufz.de
Saskia Trump
Irina Lehmann
Sabine Attinger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a widespread technique used to determine intracellular reaction and diffusion parameters. In recent years, due to technical advances and an increasing number of mathematical models for analysis, there was a resurging interest in FRAP applications. However, care has to be taken when inverting parameters from such data. We study potential influences on FRAP acquisition and analysis like initial fluorescence distribution, membrane passage, and geometrical aspects. Monte Carlo simulations are employed for the investigation of reaction-diffusion processes to additionally include cases in which no analytical description is available. To assess the importance of influencing factors we apply a sensitivity method based on elementary effects providing an estimate for the global parameter space. The combination of simulations and sensitivity measure helps us to predict ranges of parameters used in acquisition and analysis for which a reliably inversion of reaction-diffusion parameters is possible. Using this approach, we show that FRAP data are highly susceptible to misinterpretation. However, by identifying the parameters of susceptibility, our analysis provides the means for taking measures to significantly improve FRAP data interpretation and analysis.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID23663852
PMCPMC3647172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.