Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23663799›Full record

ArticleJournal of physiotherapy2013

Acute low back usually resolves quickly but persistent low back pain often persists.

Ingrid Heuch, Ida Stange Foss

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physiotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Yoga for chronic non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Classification of patients with incident non-specific low back pain: implications for research.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Recommendations for management of low-back pain misleading.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingrid HeuchDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ida Stange Foss
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the evidence of clinical course of pain and disability in patients with acute and persistent low-back pain, and to investigate whether pain and disability had similar courses. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase databases were searched from 1950 to November, 2011. This search was supplemented by searching of reference lists from eligible studies. STUDY SELECTION: Inception cohort studies involving patients with acute (< 6 weeks) and persistent (≥ 6 weeks) low-back pain in which pain or disability outcomes were reported. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers extracted data and discrepancies were resolved by consulting a third reviewer. Methodological quality was assessed using 5 criteria suggested by Altman (2001). A meta-analysis of pain and disability outcome data was conducted, in which pain and disability were modelled as a function of time. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 28 613 studies initially identified by the search, 43 studies (33 cohorts) with a total of 11 166 patients met the selection criteria. Data quality was insufficient in many of the studies; only 52% of the studies explicitly reported methods for assembling a representative sample, 73% had a follow-up of at least 80%, and 88% had a follow-up for at least one prognosis outcome at three months or longer. Based on the quantitative pooling of 24 cohorts and 4994 patients the variance-weighted mean pain score (0-100) was 52 (95% CI 48 to 57) at baseline, 23 (95% CI 21 to 25) at 6 weeks, 12 (95% CI 9 to 15) at 26 weeks, and 6 (95% CI 3 to 10) at 52 weeks after the onset of pain for cohorts with acute pain. Among cohorts with persistent pain, the variance-weighted mean pain score (out of 100) was 51 (95% CI 44 to 59) at baseline, 33 (95% CI 29 to 38) at 6 weeks, 26 (95% CI 20 to 33) at 26 weeks, and 23 (95% CI 16 to 30) at 52 weeks after the onset of pain. The course of disability outcomes was similar to the time course of pain outcomes in the acute pain cohorts, but for persistent pain cohorts disability only improved slowly, despite substantial initial improvement in pain. There were large within-study and between-study variation in outcomes.

conclusionMost people who seek care for acute or persistent low-back pain improved markedly within the first six weeks, but afterwards improvement slowed. Low to moderate levels of pain and disability were still present at one year, especially in people with persistent pain.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationQuality of LifeHumansLow Back Pain

Identifiers

PMID23663799
OpenAlexW2095273774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.