Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23663439›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2013

Personalized medicine: myth or reality? The position of Russian clinical pharmacologists.

Anna S Zhestovskaja, Vladimir G Kukes, Dmitry A Sychev

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DoPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2017
    Article
  4. Clinical pharmacology in Russia-historical development and current state.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna S ZhestovskajaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases, I,M, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Trubetskaja 8, Moscow 119991, Russia. masik_8787@mail.ru.
Vladimir G Kukes
Dmitry A Sychev
Sechenov University · RURussian Scientific Center of Surgery · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A personalized medicine, a recent trend of clinical pharmacology, makes possible the individual approach to the choice of the drugs and their dosage. According to the results of a study of the activity of different biomarkers, particularly the isoenzymes of the cytochrome P-450, they provide the efficiency and safety of the pharmacotherapy. The activity of the isoenzymes of the cytochrome P-450 determines an individual pharmacological response and depends on many factors, including genetic ones. The biomarkers of the activity of the isoenzymes of the cytochrome P-450 should be tested in the clinical practice settings using the simple and cheap methods, one of the most available is an immunofluorescent assay. The skilled staff and the centers of personalized medicine are necessary for this approach.

Identifiers

PMID23663439
PMCPMC3726329
OpenAlexW2112410506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.