Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23663100›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2013

n→π* interactions of amides and thioamides: implications for protein stability.

Robert W Newberry, Brett VanVeller, Ilia A Guzei, Ronald T Raines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Backbone double-mutant cycle analysis quantifies hydrogen-bond energies in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of Energy Effects DeterminingACS physical chemistry Au · 2026
    Article
  6. HalogenatedRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Thioamide Analogues of MHC I Antigen Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert W NewberryDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Brett VanVeller
Ilia A Guzei
Ronald T Raines
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008349 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FOX, BRIAN G · 1989 to 2019
$22.5M
COLLAGEN STRUCTURE AND STABILITY IN VITRO AND IN VIVOR01AR044276 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RAINES, RONALD T · 1996 to 2017
$5.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR044276NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbonyl-carbonyl interactions between adjacent backbone amides have been implicated in the conformational stability of proteins. By combining experimental and computational approaches, we show that relevant amidic carbonyl groups associate through an n→π* donor-acceptor interaction with an energy of at least 0.27 kcal/mol. The n→π* interaction between two thioamides is 3-fold stronger than between two oxoamides due to increased overlap and reduced energy difference between the donor and acceptor orbitals. This result suggests that backbone thioamide incorporation could stabilize protein structures. Finally, we demonstrate that intimate carbonyl interactions are described more completely as donor-acceptor orbital interactions rather than dipole-dipole interactions.

Indexed as

AmidesProteinsSulfhydryl CompoundsAmidesProteinsSulfhydryl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID23663100
PMCPMC3742804
OpenAlexW1969697060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.