Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23661758›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2013

Networks of bZIP protein-protein interactions diversified over a billion years of evolution.

Aaron W Reinke, Jiyeon Baek, Orr Ashenberg, Amy E Keating

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Novel Role of Ume6 inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. TF paralogs-Natural experiments in DNA binding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aaron W ReinkeMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Biology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Jiyeon Baek
Orr Ashenberg
Amy E Keating

Funding

Analysis and Design of Coiled Coil PartneringR01GM067681 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KEATING, AMY E · 2004 to 2012
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM067681NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in biomolecular sequence and function underlie dramatic ranges of appearance and behavior among species. We studied the basic region-leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors and quantified bZIP dimerization networks for five metazoan and two single-cell species, measuring interactions in vitro for 2891 protein pairs. Metazoans have a higher proportion of heteromeric bZIP interactions and more network complexity than the single-cell species. The metazoan bZIP interactomes have broadly similar structures, but there has been extensive rewiring of connections compared to the last common ancestor, and each species network is highly distinct. Many metazoan bZIP orthologs and paralogs have strikingly different interaction specificities, and some differences arise from minor sequence changes. Our data show that a shifting landscape of biochemical functions related to signaling and gene expression contributes to species diversity.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMetabolic Networks and PathwaysAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsConserved SequenceHumansMolecular Sequence DataProtein MultimerizationBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23661758
PMCPMC4115154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.