Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23661563›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2013

All or nothing: protein complexes flip essentiality between distantly related eukaryotes.

Colm J Ryan, Nevan J Krogan, Pádraig Cunningham, Gerard Cagney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Mitotic spindle formation in the absence of Polo kinase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Why are essential genes essential? - The essentiality ofMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2015
    Review
  15. Protein complexes in bacteria.PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Colm J RyanSchool of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Ireland. colm.ryan@ucd.ie
Nevan J Krogan
Pádraig Cunningham
Gerard Cagney
University College Dublin · IEQB3 · US

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEVEN Grant DEEKS · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
Rewiring Therapeutic Cells: User-Controlled T Cells and Stem CellsP50GM081879 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIM, WENDELL A · 2010 to 2017
$19.0M
Comparative Analysis of Genetic Interaction NetworksR01GM084279 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2008 to 2017
$3.9M
Genetic Analysis of the Nucleosome and RNA Polymerase II: A Systems ApproachR01GM084448 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2008 to 2012
$2.3M
Integrating computation and genetics to quantify specificity in protein networksR01GM098101 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KORTEMME, TANJA, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NIGMS NIH HHS GM081879NIGMS NIH HHS GM084279NIGMS NIH HHS GM084448NIGMS NIH HHS GM098101NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081879NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084279NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084448NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the subunits of any given protein complex are either mostly essential or mostly nonessential, suggesting that essentiality is a property of molecular machines rather than individual components. There are exceptions to this rule, however, that is, nonessential genes in largely essential complexes and essential genes in largely nonessential complexes. Here, we provide explanations for these exceptions, showing that redundancy within complexes, as revealed by genetic interactions, can explain many of the former cases, whereas "moonlighting," as revealed by membership of multiple complexes, can explain the latter. Surprisingly, we find that redundancy within complexes cannot usually be explained by gene duplication, suggesting alternate buffering mechanisms. In the distantly related Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we observe the same phenomenon of modular essentiality, suggesting that it may be a general feature of eukaryotes. Furthermore, we show that complexes flip essentiality in a cohesive fashion between the two species, that is, they tend to change from mostly essential to mostly nonessential, or vice versa, but not to mixed patterns. We show that these flips in essentiality can be explained by differing lifestyles of the two yeasts. Collectively, our results support a previously proposed model where proteins are essential because of their involvement in essential functional modules rather than because of specific topological features such as degree or centrality.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsGene OntologyGenes, EssentialGenes, FungalProtein Interaction MappingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinsessentialitygenetic interactionsmodularityprotein complexesredundancyyeast

Identifiers

PMID23661563
PMCPMC3698920
OpenAlexW1983687368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.