Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23661403›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2013

Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane Systematic Review.

M P W Grocott, A Dushianthan, M A Hamilton, M G Mythen, D Harrison, K Rowan, Optimisation Systematic Review Steering Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02194101 (Supernormal Oxygen Delivery May Not be a Valid Goal for Patients With Proximal Femur Fracture. An Observational Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
21.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02194101 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Supernormal Oxygen Delivery May Not be a Valid Goal for Patients With Proximal Femur Fracture. An Observational Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorGuangzhou First People's HospitalRan2014 to 2015Enrolled30ConditionsFemoral FracturesArmsSupernormal oxygen delivery goal therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimens in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M P W GrocottIntegrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, University of Southampton, CE 93, MP 24, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
A Dushianthan
M A Hamilton
M G Mythen
D Harrison
K Rowan
Optimisation Systematic Review Steering Group
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George's Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the clinical effects of increasing perioperative blood flow using fluids with or without inotropes/vasoactive drugs to explicit defined goals in adults. We included randomized controlled trials of adult patients (aged 16 years or older) undergoing surgery. We included 31 studies of 5292 participants. There was no difference in mortality at the longest follow-up: 282/2615 (10.8%) died in the control group and 238/2677 (8.9%) in the treatment group, RR of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76-1.05; P=0.18). However, the results were sensitive to analytical methods and withdrawal of studies with methodological limitations. The intervention reduced the rate of three morbidities (renal failure, respiratory failure, and wound infections) but not the rates of arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure, venous thrombosis, and other types of infections. The number of patients with complications was also reduced by the intervention. Hospital length of stay was reduced in the treatment group by 1.16 days. There was no difference in critical care length of stay. The primary analysis of this review showed no difference between groups but this result was sensitive to the method of analysis, withdrawal of studies with methodological limitations, and was dominated by a single large study. Patients receiving this intervention stayed in hospital 1 day less with fewer complications. It is unlikely that the intervention causes harm. The balance of current evidence does not support widespread implementation of this approach to reduce mortality but does suggest that complications and duration of hospital stay are reduced.

Indexed as

fluid therapyperioperative caresurgery

Identifiers

PMID23661403
OpenAlexW2105639358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.