Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23660291›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2013

Differences in imaging characteristics of HPV-positive and HPV-Negative oropharyngeal cancers: a blinded matched-pair analysis.

S C Cantrell, B W Peck, G Li, Q Wei, E M Sturgis, L E Ginsberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S C CantrellDepartments of Diagnostic Imaging.
B W Peck
G Li
Q Wei
E M Sturgis
L E Ginsberg
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the p53 pathway for reversal of oral premalignancyP50CA097007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MYERS, JEFFREY NICHOLAS · 2002 to 2012
$26.1M
Molecular Epidemiology of Head and Neck CancerR01ES011740 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WEI, QINGYI · 2001 to 2012
$6.3M
Genotypes and Phenotypes of Apoptosis and Risk of Head and Neck CancerR01CA131274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WEI, QINGYI · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
Use of Serum HPV16 DNA as a Marker for Oropharyngeal Cancer RecurrenceR03CA128110 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI STURGIS, ERICH MADISON · 2007 to 2008
$154k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097007NCI NIH HHS P50CA097007NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131274NCI NIH HHS R01CA131274NCI NIH HHS R03 CA128110NCI NIH HHS R03CA128110-01A1NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011740NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES011740PHS HHS K-12 88084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeHuman papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancers typically have younger age of onset, limited tobacco exposure, and more favorable prognosis than HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers. We assessed whether HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers have consistent differences in pretreatment imaging characteristics. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective review of 136 pretreatment CT examinations of paired HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers matched for T stage, tumor subsite, and smoking status was performed with the reviewing radiologist blinded to HPV status and clinical stage. Demographic/clinical characteristics and imaging characteristics of primary lesions and metastatic nodal disease were compared by use of Fisher exact testing. The McNemar χ(2) test was used for the matched-pair analysis.

resultsBy imaging, HPV-negative tumors were more likely to demonstrate invasion of adjacent muscle (26% versus 6%, P = .013). HPV-positive primary tumors were more likely to be enhancing and exophytic with well-defined borders, whereas HPV-negative primary tumors were more likely to be isoattenuated and demonstrate ill-defined borders, though these results were not statistically significant. HPV-positive tumors were more likely to demonstrate cystic nodal metastases than HPV-negative tumors (36% versus 9%, P = .002).

conclusionsIn this matched and blinded analysis of the imaging differences between HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers, HPV-positive carcinomas often had primary lesions with well-defined borders and cystic nodal metastases, whereas HPV-negative primaries more often had poorly defined borders and invasion of adjacent muscle.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellOropharyngeal NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansIncidenceLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPapillomavirus Infections

Identifiers

PMID23660291
PMCPMC3951375
OpenAlexW2156490355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.