Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23660172›Full record

ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2013

Trends in use of and survival after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in North America, 1995-2005: significant improvement in survival for lymphoma and myeloma during a period of increasing recipient age.

Philip L McCarthy, Theresa Hahn, Anna Hassebroek, Christopher Bredeson, James Gajewski, Gregory Hale, Luis Isola, Hillard M Lazarus, Stephanie J Lee, Charles F Lemaistre and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. National Institutes of Health Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Late Effects Initiative: The Research Methodology and Study Design Working Group Report.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Guideline
  2. Indications for Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2015
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Conditional Long-Term Survival after Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trends in Late Mortality and Life Expectancy After Autologous Blood or Marrow Transplantation Over Three Decades: A BMTSS Report.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Philip L McCarthyDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Theresa Hahn
Anna Hassebroek
Christopher Bredeson
James Gajewski
Gregory Hale
Luis Isola
Hillard M Lazarus
Stephanie J Lee
Charles F Lemaistre
Fausto Loberiza
Richard T Maziarz
J Douglas Rizzo
Steven Joffe
Susan Parsons
Navneet S Majhail

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
PB vs. BMU01HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2001 to 2010
$63.3M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24-CA76518NHLBI NIH HHS 5U01HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL069294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is performed to treat relapsed and recurrent malignant disorders and as part of initial therapy for selected malignancies. This study evaluated changes in use, techniques, and survival in a population-based cohort of 68,404 patients who underwent first auto-HCT in a US or Canadian center between 1994 and 2005 and were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The mean annual number of auto-HCTs performed was highest during 1996-1999 (6948), and decreased subsequently 2000-2003 (4783), owing mainly to fewer auto-HCTs done to treat breast cancer. However, the mean annual number of auto-HCTs increased from 5278 annually in 1994-1995 to 5459 annually in 2004-2005, reflecting increased use for multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Despite an increase in the median recipient age from 44 to 53 years, there has been a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) from 1994 to 2005 in patients with chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (day +100 OS, from 85% to 96%; 1-year OS, from 68% to 80%; P < .001) and chemotherapy-sensitive multiple myeloma (day +100 OS, from 96% to 98%; 1-year OS, from 83% to 92%; P < .001). This improvement in OS was most pronounced in middle-aged (>40 years) and older (>60 years) individuals.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHodgkin DiseaseHumansInfantLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNorth America

Identifiers

PMID23660172
PMCPMC3694566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.