Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23658805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

The energy expenditure of sedentary behavior: a whole room calorimeter study.

Robert L Newton, Hongmei Han, Theodore Zderic, Mark T Hamilton, Marc Hamilton

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Physiology of sedentary behavior.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sitting, squatting, and the evolutionary biology of human inactivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Associations of context-specific sitting time with markers of cardiometabolic risk in Australian adults.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Hamilton, Marc [corrected to Hamilton, Mark T]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert L NewtonPreventive Medicine and Healthy Aging, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America. Robert.Newton@pbrc.edu
Hongmei Han
Theodore Zderic
Mark T Hamilton
Marc Hamilton
Pennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Leanne Maree Redman · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
Measurement of Sedentary Behavior in African American AdultsK01HL088723 · NHLBI · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI NEWTON, ROBERT LEE · 2007 to 2011
$359k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL088723NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL088723-01NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has recently been recommended that sedentary behavior be defined as sitting or reclining activities expending less than 1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs), which is distinct from the traditional viewpoint based on insufficient moderate-vigorous activity or formal exercise. This study was designed to determine the energy expenditure associated with common sedentary behaviors. Twenty-five African American adults (BMI 27.8 ± 5.5) participated in the metabolic chamber study. Participants entered the metabolic chamber in the morning and their basal metabolic rate was estimated. They were fed breakfast and then engaged in four different sedentary behaviors sequentially, lasting 30 minutes each. The activities included reclining, watching TV, reading, and typing on a computer. In the afternoon, the participants were fed lunch and then the activities were repeated. The results show that the energy expenditure values between the morning and afternoon sessions were not significantly different (p = .232). The mean energy expenditure of postprandial reclining (0.97 METs) was slightly, but significantly, lower than postprandial watching TV (p = .021) and typing (p<.001). There were no differences in energy cost (1.03-1.06 METs) between the seated (i.e., reading, typing, watching TV) sedentary activities. The energy expenditure of several common sedentary behaviors was approximately 1.0 METs in the postprandial state. The results support the conclusion that the average energy cost of common sedentary behaviors is narrowly banded around 1.0 METs in the postprandial state.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorAdultBasal MetabolismBlack or African AmericanBody Mass IndexCalorimetryEnergy MetabolismExerciseFemaleHumansLeisure ActivitiesMalePostprandial PeriodSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23658805
PMCPMC3643905
OpenAlexW2054825615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.