Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23658691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Comparative transcriptional profiling of the axolotl limb identifies a tripartite regeneration-specific gene program.

Dunja Knapp, Herbert Schulz, Cynthia Alexander Rascon, Michael Volkmer, Juliane Scholz, Eugen Nacu, Mu Le, Sergey Novozhilov, Akira Tazaki, Stephanie Protze and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Local problems need global solutions: The metabolic needs of regenerating organisms.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Rebuilding limbs, one cell at a time.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  17. Open biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dunja KnappMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Herbert Schulz
Cynthia Alexander Rascon
Michael Volkmer
Juliane Scholz
Eugen Nacu
Mu Le
Sergey Novozhilov
Akira Tazaki
Stephanie Protze
Tina Jacob
Norbert Hubner
Bianca Habermann
Elly M Tanaka
TU Dresden · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEMax Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how the limb blastema is established after the initial wound healing response is an important aspect of regeneration research. Here we performed parallel expression profile time courses of healing lateral wounds versus amputated limbs in axolotl. This comparison between wound healing and regeneration allowed us to identify amputation-specific genes. By clustering the expression profiles of these samples, we could detect three distinguishable phases of gene expression - early wound healing followed by a transition-phase leading to establishment of the limb development program, which correspond to the three phases of limb regeneration that had been defined by morphological criteria. By focusing on the transition-phase, we identified 93 strictly amputation-associated genes many of which are implicated in oxidative-stress response, chromatin modification, epithelial development or limb development. We further classified the genes based on whether they were or were not significantly expressed in the developing limb bud. The specific localization of 53 selected candidates within the blastema was investigated by in situ hybridization. In summary, we identified a set of genes that are expressed specifically during regeneration and are therefore, likely candidates for the regulation of blastema formation.

Indexed as

RegenerationTranscriptomeAmbystoma mexicanumAmphibian ProteinsAnimalsCluster AnalysisExtremitiesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisStress, PhysiologicalUp-RegulationWound HealingAmphibian Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23658691
PMCPMC3641036
OpenAlexW2076017230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.