ArticlePloS one2013
Differential effects of motor efference copies and proprioceptive information on response evaluation processes.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Different Factors Determining Motor Execution and Motor Imagery Performance in a Serial Reaction Time Task with Intrinsic Variability.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Effects of Catecholaminergic and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Response Inhibition.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Altered thalamus functional connectivity in patients with acute unilateral vestibulopathy: a resting-state fMRI study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Evidence for independent representational contents in inhibitory control subprocesses associated with frontoparietal cortices.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Alcohol-induced deficits in reactive control of response selection and inhibition are counteracted by a seemingly paradox increase in proactive control.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The role of visual association cortices during response selection processes in interference-modulated response stopping.Cerebral cortex communications · 2023Article
- Rethinking Stereotypies in Autism.Seminars in pediatric neurology · 2021Review
- Anodal tDCS modulates specific processing codes during conflict monitoring associated with superior and middle frontal cortices.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Subthalamic Stimulation for Camptocormia in Parkinson's Disease: Association of Volume of Tissue Activated and Structural Connectivity with Clinical Effectiveness.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2021Article
- Balancing Prediction and Surprise: A Role for Active Sleep at the Dawn of Consciousness?Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Resting theta activity is associated with specific coding levels in event-related theta activity during conflict monitoring.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Applying deep learning to single-trial EEG data provides evidence for complementary theories on action control.Communications biology · 2020Article
- How non-veridical perception drives actions in healthy humans: evidence from synaesthesia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
- The Simon Effect Based on Allocentric and Egocentric Reference Frame: Common and Specific Neural Correlates.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.Psychological research · 2018Article
- Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Supplementary Motor Area Improves Anticipatory Postural Adjustments in Older Adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- Effects of forced movements on learning: Findings from a choice reaction time task in rats.Learning & behavior · 2017Article
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the supplementary motor area (SMA) influences performance on motor tasks.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- Latent profiles of executive functioning in healthy young adults: evidence of individual differences in hemispheric asymmetry.Psychological research · 2016Article
- Single-subject prediction of response inhibition behavior by event-related potentials.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well-kown that sensory information influences the way we execute motor responses. However, less is known about if and how sensory and motor information are integrated in the subsequent process of response evaluation. We used a modified Simon Task to investigate how these streams of information are integrated in response evaluation processes, applying an in-depth neurophysiological analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs), time-frequency decomposition and sLORETA. The results show that response evaluation processes are differentially modulated by afferent proprioceptive information and efference copies. While the influence of proprioceptive information is mediated via oscillations in different frequency bands, efference copy based information about the motor execution is specifically mediated via oscillations in the theta frequency band. Stages of visual perception and attention were not modulated by the interaction of proprioception and motor efference copies. Brain areas modulated by the interactive effects of proprioceptive and efference copy based information included the middle frontal gyrus and the supplementary motor area (SMA), suggesting that these areas integrate sensory information for the purpose of response evaluation. The results show how motor response evaluation processes are modulated by information about both the execution and the location of a response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.