Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23658483›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2013

A tissue-engineered subcutaneous pancreatic cancer model for antitumor drug evaluation.

Qingyi He, Xiaohui Wang, Xing Zhang, Huifang Han, Baosan Han, Jianzhong Xu, Kanglai Tang, Zhiren Fu, Hao Yin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A comprehensive characterization of cell cultures and xenografts derived from a human verrucous penile carcinoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Qingyi HeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China.
Xiaohui Wang
Xing Zhang
Huifang Han
Baosan Han
Jianzhong Xu
Kanglai Tang
Zhiren Fu
Hao Yin
Southwest Hospital · CNUniversity of Chicago · USXinHua Hospital · CNArmy Medical University · CNShanghai Changzheng Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional xenograft subcutaneous pancreatic cancer model is notorious for its low incidence of tumor formation, inconsistent results for the chemotherapeutic effects of drug molecules of interest, and a poor predictive capability for the clinical efficacy of novel drugs. These drawbacks are attributed to a variety of factors, including inoculation of heterogeneous tumor cells from patients with different pathological histories, and use of poorly defined Matrigel(®). In this study, we aimed to tissue-engineer a pancreatic cancer model that could readily cultivate a pancreatic tumor derived from highly homogenous CD24(+)CD44(+) pancreatic cancer stem cells delivered by a well defined electrospun scaffold of poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate) and gelatin. The scaffold supported in vitro tumorigenesis from CD24(+)CD44(+) cancer stem cells for up to 7 days without inducing apoptosis. Moreover, CD24(+)CD44(+) cancer stem cells delivered by the scaffold grew into a native-like mature pancreatic tumor within 8 weeks in vivo and exhibited accelerated tumorigenesis as well as a higher incidence of tumor formation than the traditional model. In the scaffold model, we discovered that oxaliplatin-gemcitabine (OXA-GEM), a chemotherapeutic regimen, induced tumor regression whereas gemcitabine alone only capped tumor growth. The mechanistic study attributed the superior antitumorigenic performance of OXA-GEM to its ability to induce apoptosis of CD24(+)CD44(+) cancer stem cells. Compared with the traditional model, the scaffold model demonstrated a higher incidence of tumor formation and accelerated tumor growth. Use of a tiny population of highly homogenous CD24(+)CD44(+) cancer stem cells delivered by a well defined scaffold greatly reduces the variability associated with the traditional model, which uses a heterogeneous tumor cell population and poorly defined Matrigel. The scaffold model is a robust platform for investigating the antitumorigenesis mechanism of novel chemotherapeutic drugs with a special focus on cancer stem cells.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, ExperimentalPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell SurvivalDeoxycytidineFemaleFlow CytometryGemcitabineHumansMice, NudeNanofibersNanotechnologyNeoplastic Stem CellsOrganoplatinum CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatincancer stem cellelectrospun scaffoldgemcitabineoxaliplatinpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID23658483
PMCPMC3607421
OpenAlexW1559541585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.