Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23658261›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Multicenter evaluation of the Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system for identification of Gram-positive aerobic bacteria.

Jenna Rychert, Carey-Ann D Burnham, Maureen Bythrow, Omai B Garner, Christine C Ginocchio, Rebecca Jennemann, Michael A Lewinski, Ryhana Manji, A Brian Mochon, Gary W Procop and 5 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Performance of the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for rapid identification of streptococci: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Identification and Differentiation of Non-HemolyticMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Impact of rapid identification by MALDI-TOF MS from positive blood cultures in Enterococcus spp. bloodstream infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Food science & nutrition · 2022
    Review
  11. Diagnostic challenges with accurate identification ofAfrican journal of laboratory medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Multicenter evaluation of the VITEK MS matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system for identification of bacteria, including Brucella, and yeasts.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Evolution of the liver biopsy and its future.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
  15. VitekMycopathologia · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of Vitek MS for Differentiation ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jenna RychertDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. jrychert@partners.org
Carey-Ann D Burnham
Maureen Bythrow
Omai B Garner
Christine C Ginocchio
Rebecca Jennemann
Michael A Lewinski
Ryhana Manji
A Brian Mochon
Gary W Procop
Sandra S Richter
Linda Sercia
Lars F Westblade
Mary Jane Ferraro
John A Branda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) is gaining momentum as a tool for bacterial identification in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Compared with conventional methods, this technology can more readily and conveniently identify a wide range of organisms. Here, we report the findings from a multicenter study to evaluate the Vitek MS v2.0 system (bioMérieux, Inc.) for the identification of aerobic Gram-positive bacteria. A total of 1,146 unique isolates, representing 13 genera and 42 species, were analyzed, and results were compared to those obtained by nucleic acid sequence-based identification as the reference method. For 1,063 of 1,146 isolates (92.8%), the Vitek MS provided a single identification that was accurate to the species level. For an additional 31 isolates (2.7%), multiple possible identifications were provided, all correct at the genus level. Mixed-genus or single-choice incorrect identifications were provided for 18 isolates (1.6%). Although no identification was obtained for 33 isolates (2.9%), there was no specific bacterial species for which the Vitek MS consistently failed to provide identification. In a subset of 463 isolates representing commonly encountered important pathogens, 95% were accurately identified to the species level and there were no misidentifications. Also, in all but one instance, the Vitek MS correctly differentiated Streptococcus pneumoniae from other viridans group streptococci. The findings demonstrate that the Vitek MS system is highly accurate for the identification of Gram-positive aerobic bacteria in the clinical laboratory setting.

Indexed as

Bacteria, AerobicBacteriological TechniquesDiagnostic ErrorsGram-Positive BacteriaHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID23658261
PMCPMC3697712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.