Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23658254›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Ward-specific rates of nasal cocolonization with methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus spp. and potential impact on molecular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening tests.

Sophie Trouillet-Assant, Jean-Philippe Rasigade, Sebastien Lustig, Yannick Lhoste, Florent Valour, Claude Guerin, Frederic Aubrun, Sylvestre Tigaud, Frederic Laurent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Performance of the Hologic Panther Fusion® MRSA Assay for the nasal screening of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sophie Trouillet-AssantDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Northern Hospital Group, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. sophie.assant@chu-lyon.fr
Jean-Philippe Rasigade
Sebastien Lustig
Yannick Lhoste
Florent Valour
Claude Guerin
Frederic Aubrun
Sylvestre Tigaud
Frederic Laurent

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report that the rates of nasal cocolonization with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci can vary widely between patients admitted to different wards within a single hospital. Such cocolonization can greatly influence the performance of molecular methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) screening tests depending on the methods used and targets selected.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesCarrier StateCross InfectionDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesStaphylococcal Infections

Identifiers

PMID23658254
PMCPMC3697672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.