Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23658135›Full record

SynthesisDepression and anxiety2013

Cognitive behavioral therapy age effects in child and adolescent anxiety: an individual patient data metaanalysis.

Kathryn Bennett, Katharina Manassis, Stephen D Walter, Amy Cheung, Pamela Wilansky-Traynor, Natalia Diaz-Granados, Stephanie Duda, Maureen Rice, Susan Baer, Paula Barrett and 18 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Depression and anxiety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Interventions for Young Children's Mental Health: A Review of Reviews.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Kathryn BennettDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. kbennett@mcmaster.ca
Katharina Manassis
Stephen D Walter
Amy Cheung
Pamela Wilansky-Traynor
Natalia Diaz-Granados
Stephanie Duda
Maureen Rice
Susan Baer
Paula Barrett
Denise Bodden
Vanessa E Cobham
Mark R Dadds
Ellen Flannery-Schroeder
Golda Ginsburg
David Heyne
Jennifer L Hudson
Philip C Kendall
Juliette Liber
Carrie Masia Warner
Sandra Mendlowitz
Maaike H Nauta
Ronald M Rapee
Wendy Silverman
Lynne Siqueland
Susan H Spence
Elisabeth Utens
Jeffrey J Wood

Funding

CIHR 86250-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvestigations of age effects on youth anxiety outcomes in randomized trials (RCTs) of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) have failed to yield a clear result due to inadequate statistical power and methodologic weaknesses. We conducted an individual patient data metaanalysis to address this gap. QUESTION: Does age moderate CBT effect size, measured by a clinically and statistically significant interaction between age and CBT exposure?

methodsAll English language RCTs of CBT for anxiety in 6-19 year olds were identified using systematic review methods. Investigators of eligible trials were invited to submit their individual patient data. The anxiety disorder interview schedule (ADIS) primary diagnosis severity score was the primary outcome. Age effects were investigated using multilevel modeling to account for study level data clustering and random effects.

resultsData from 17 of 23 eligible trials were obtained (74%); 16 studies and 1,171 (78%) cases were available for the analysis. No interaction between age and CBT exposure was found in a model containing age, sex, ADIS baseline severity score, and comorbid depression diagnosis (power ≥ 80%). Sensitivity analyses, including modeling age as both a categorical and continuous variable, revealed this result was robust.

conclusionsAdolescents who receive CBT in efficacy research studies show benefits comparable to younger children. However, CBT protocol modifications routinely carried out by expert trial therapists may explain these findings. Adolescent CBT protocols are needed to facilitate the transportability of efficacy research effects to usual care settings where therapists may have less opportunity for CBT training and expertise development.

Indexed as

Age FactorsCognitive Behavioral TherapyAdolescentAnxiety DisordersChildFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultanxiety disorderschild/adolescentcognitive behavior therapyempirical supported treatmenttreatment

Identifiers

PMID23658135
PMCPMC4854623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.