Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23657754›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of behavioral health services & research2015

A cluster randomized trial of adding peer specialists to intensive case management teams in the Veterans Health Administration.

Matthew Chinman, Rebecca S Oberman, Barbara H Hanusa, Amy N Cohen, Michelle P Salyers, Elizabeth W Twamley, Alexander S Young

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00781079 (Promoting Recovery Using Mental Health Consumer Providers), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00781079 nacompletednot on this map

Promoting Recovery Using Mental Health Consumer Providers

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2008 to 2012Enrolled285ConditionsMental DisorderArmsConsumer Provider
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Telephone veteran peer coaching for mental health treatment engagement among rural veterans: The importance of secondary outcomes and qualitative data in a randomized controlled trial.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew ChinmanVISN-4, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare, Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, matthew_chinman@rand.org.
Rebecca S Oberman
Barbara H Hanusa
Amy N Cohen
Michelle P Salyers
Elizabeth W Twamley
Alexander S Young
Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

HSRD VA IIR 06-227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of peer specialists (PSs)--individuals with serious mental illness who use their experiences to help others with serious mental illness--is increasing. However, their impact on patient outcomes has not been demonstrated definitively. This cluster randomized, controlled trial within the Veterans Health Administration compared patients served by three intensive case management teams that each deployed two PSs for 1 year, to the patients of three similar teams without PSs (Usual Care). All patients (PS group = 149, Usual Care = 133) had substantial psychiatric inpatient histories and a primary Axis 1 psychiatric disorder. Before and after the year PSs worked, patients were surveyed on their recovery, quality of life, activation (health self-management efficacy), interpersonal relations, and symptoms. Patients in the PS group improved significantly more (z = 2.00, df = 1, p = 0.05) than those receiving Usual Care on activation. There were no other significant differences. PSs helped patients become more active in treatment, which can promote recovery.

Indexed as

Peer GroupVeterans HealthCase ManagementFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersQuality of LifeUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID23657754
PMCPMC5649383
OpenAlexW1970386909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.