Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23657729›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2013

Comparison of keratocyte density after femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome from 3 months up to 5 years after LASIK.

Pilar Cañadas, Laura de Benito-Llopis, José Luis Hernández-Verdejo, Miguel A Teus

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Update on Corneal Confocal Microscopy Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pilar CañadasVissum Corporation, C/ Santa Hortensia 58, 28002, Madrid, Spain, pilarcanadas.s@gmail.com.
Laura de Benito-Llopis
José Luis Hernández-Verdejo
Miguel A Teus
Miranza · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare keratocyte density after mechanical microkeratome LASIK (MK-LASIK) and femtosecond-laser assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK).

methodsWe performed a prospective study of myopic patients that underwent MK-LASIK or FS-LASIK. We measured keratocyte density 3 and 15 months, and 3-5 years after the surgery using confocal microscopy, and compared them with healthy, non-operated corneas.

resultsThirty-one eyes were included in the FS-LASIK group, 30 in the MK-LASIK group and 28 in the control group. Three months postoperatively, there was an increase in the keratocyte population of the whole cornea, mainly due to the mid and posterior stromal layers, in both treatment groups. It was also increased in the stromal bed after MK-LASIK, but not after FS-LASIK. In both groups, this was followed by a normalisation and stabilisation of cell density in those deeper layers 15 months after the surgery. Keratocyte density in the flap and stromal bed was decreased 15 months after FS- and MK-LASIK compared to 3 months postoperatively and compared to controls. It seemed to remain stable thereafter. In spite of this decrease, the average cell density throughout the cornea was not decreased compared to controls at any time point.

conclusionWe found a reorganization of keratocytes density after LASIK, with an initial increase, followed by a decrease in the stromal flap and stromal bed 15 months postoperatively, and stable from then onwards, but still maintaining normal average densities in the total cornea. There were no differences between MK- and FS-LASIK.

Indexed as

AdultCell CountCorneal KeratocytesCorneal PachymetryCorneal StromaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKeratomileusis, Laser In SituLasers, ExcimerMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMyopiaProspective StudiesSurgical FlapsVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID23657729
OpenAlexW2111417313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.