Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23657490›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2013

Effect of peer-based low back pain information and reassurance at the workplace on sick leave: a cluster randomized trial.

Magnus Odeen, Camilla Ihlebæk, Aage Indahl, Marjon E A Wormgoor, Stein A Lie, Hege R Eriksen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00741650 (Ibedrift- Health Related Coping. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Worksite Educational Intervention With or Without Referral to Treatment as Usual.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00741650 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Ibedrift- Health Related Coping. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Worksite Educational Intervention With or Without Referral to Treatment as Usual.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNORCE Norwegian Research Centre ASRan2008 to 2012Enrolled2,097ConditionsNeck Pain Musculoskeletal, Back Pain Lower BackArmsInformation and Peer advisor, Information, peer advisor and fast referral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Development of the workplace inclusion questionnaire (WIQ).Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Should musicians play in pain?British journal of pain · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magnus OdeenUni Health, Uni Research, P.O. Box 7810, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla Ihlebæk
Aage Indahl
Marjon E A Wormgoor
Stein A Lie
Hege R Eriksen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether information and reassurance about low back pain (LBP) given to employees at the workplace could reduce sick leave.

methodsA Cluster randomized controlled trial with 135 work units of about 3,500 public sector employees in two Norwegian municipalities, randomized into two intervention groups; Education and peer support (EPS) (n = 45 units), education and "peer support and access to an outpatient clinic" (EPSOC) (n = 48 units), and a control group (n = 42 units). Both interventions consisted of educational meetings based on a "non-injury model" and a "peer adviser" appointed by colleagues. Employees in the EPSOC group had access to an outpatient clinic for medical examination and further education. The control group received no intervention. The main outcome was sick leave based on municipal records. Secondary outcomes were self-reported pain, pain related fear of movement, coping, and beliefs about LBP from survey data of 1,746 employees (response rate about 50 %).

resultsEPS reduced sick leave by 7 % and EPSOC reduced sick leave by 4 % during the intervention year, while sick leave in the control group was increased by 7 % during the same period. Overall, Rate Ratios (RR) were statistically significant for EPSOC (RR = .84 (C.I = 0.71-.99) but not EPS (RR = .92 (C.I = 0.78-1.09)) in a mixed Poisson regression analysis. Faulty beliefs about LBP were reduced in both intervention groups.

conclusionsEducational meetings, combined with peer support and access to an outpatient clinic, were effective in reducing sick leave in public sector employees.

Indexed as

Peer GroupWorkplaceAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNorwayOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicSick LeaveYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23657490
PMCPMC3666125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.