Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23657401›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2013

Normal values and pressure morphology for three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry of asymptomatic adults: a study in 110 subjects.

Yuwei Li, Xiaoqing Yang, Chen Xu, Yi Zhang, Xipeng Zhang

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nutrients · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry and Balloon Expulsion Test Outcomes in Functional Constipation: A Comparative Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Optimizing the Utility of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosis and Therapy: A Roundtable Review and Recommendations.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuwei LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital, 190, Jieyuan Road, Hongqiao District, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqing Yang
Chen Xu
Yi Zhang
Xipeng Zhang
Nankai University · CNTianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Nankai Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study is to evaluate normal values and pressure morphology of three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D-HRM) in asymptomatic volunteers and to determine the relationship between objective measurable values, gender, and age. PATIENTS AND

methodsAnorectal pressures and rectal sensation were evaluated in 110 asymptomatic volunteers (46 females and 64 males) ranging in age from 18 to 80 years (median age, 52 years) in left lateral position by three-dimensional high-resolution manometry.

resultsMaximum squeeze pressure, residual anal pressure, and intrarectal pressure were significantly higher in males compared to females (p < 0.05 each). Duration of sustained squeeze was significantly lower in males compared to females (p < 0.05). Maximum resting pressure, mean resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure were inversely correlated (r = -0.310, p < 0.01, r = -0.276, p < 0.01, and r = -0.198, p < 0.05) with age. The value of rectoanal pressure differential was -13.1 ± 5.8 mmHg which was negative during defecation. Overall variation coefficient in anorectal pressures ranged between 0.21 and 0.34.

conclusionThis study establishes normal values for anorectal pressure by 3D-HRM in asymptomatic volunteers. There are significant gender differences concerning squeeze patterns. Increasing age is associated with lower maximum resting pressure, mean resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure. Normal characteristic pressure morphology of anorectum can be obtained at rest, during squeeze, and bear down as in defecation by 3D-HRM.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalManometryPressureAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnal CanalFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationRectumReference Values

Identifiers

PMID23657401
OpenAlexW2035472106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.