Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23657258›Full record

ArticleNature2013

Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals.

Leonidas Salichos, Antonis Rokas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 265 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
265citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

265 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Phylogenetic Insights from a NovelPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Paleobiome dynamics shaped a large Gondwanan plant radiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Deep origins, distinct adaptations, and species-level status indicated for a glacial relict seal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

205 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leonidas SalichosDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Antonis Rokas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To tackle incongruence, the topological conflict between different gene trees, phylogenomic studies couple concatenation with practices such as rogue taxon removal or the use of slowly evolving genes. Phylogenomic analysis of 1,070 orthologues from 23 yeast genomes identified 1,070 distinct gene trees, which were all incongruent with the phylogeny inferred from concatenation. Incongruence severity increased for shorter internodes located deeper in the phylogeny. Notably, whereas most practices had little or negative impact on the yeast phylogeny, the use of genes or internodes with high average internode support significantly improved the robustness of inference. We obtained similar results in analyses of vertebrate and metazoan phylogenomic data sets. These results question the exclusive reliance on concatenation and associated practices, and argue that selecting genes with strong phylogenetic signals and demonstrating the absence of significant incongruence are essential for accurately reconstructing ancient divergences.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, FungalPhylogenyCandidaDatabases, GeneticGenome, FungalModels, GeneticSaccharomycesSequence AlignmentTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23657258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.