Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23656885›Full record

ReviewBMC genetics2013

Candidate gene association studies: a comprehensive guide to useful in silico tools.

Radhika Patnala, Judith Clements, Jyotsna Batra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Association between aBioMed research international · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Synaptotagmin 4 Supports Spontaneous Axon Sprouting after Spinal Cord Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Role of TNFPain research & management · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risky Early Family Environment and Genetic Associations with Adult Metabolic Dysregulation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. The Role of Pharmacogenomics in Opioid Prescribing.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetic variation in the ovineArchives animal breeding · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Radhika PatnalaAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre - Queensland, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia.
Judith Clements
Jyotsna Batra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The candidate gene approach has been a pioneer in the field of genetic epidemiology, identifying risk alleles and their association with clinical traits. With the advent of rapidly changing technology, there has been an explosion of in silico tools available to researchers, giving them fast, efficient resources and reliable strategies important to find casual gene variants for candidate or genome wide association studies (GWAS). In this review, following a description of candidate gene prioritisation, we summarise the approaches to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) prioritisation and discuss the tools available to assess functional relevance of the risk variant with consideration to its genomic location. The strategy and the tools discussed are applicable to any study investigating genetic risk factors associated with a particular disease. Some of the tools are also applicable for the functional validation of variants relevant to the era of GWAS and next generation sequencing (NGS).

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyComputer SimulationHumansQuantitative Trait LociRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID23656885
PMCPMC3655892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.