ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2013
Separation anxiety: an analysis of ethylene-induced cleavage of EIN2.
Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Insights into Phase Separation Processes and Membraneless Condensates of EIN2.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Uncertainty of EIN2Plant communications · 2020Article
- Mechanistic Insights in Ethylene Perception and Signal Transduction.Plant physiology · 2015Review
- Novel connections and gaps in ethylene signaling from the ER membrane to the nucleus.Frontiers in plant science · 2014Article
- Response to perspective: "separation anxiety: an analysis of ethylene-induced cleavage of EIN2".Plant signaling & behavior · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the discovery of the CTR1 protein kinase and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized EIN2 protein nearly 20 y ago, plant biologists have wondered how these proteins respectively serve as negative and positive regulators of ethylene-mediated signal transduction in plants. Now with the publication of four studies, it can be concluded that in the absence of ethylene (ET) in Arabidopsis thaliana, CTR1 phosphorylates EIN2 thereby inactivating ET signal transduction, while in the presence of ET, CTR1 no longer phosphorylates EIN2 and the cytosolic C-terminus of EIN2 is released from the ER to translocate to the nucleus to promote gene transcription. Chen et al. (2011) showed that EIN2 is differentially phosphorylated at amino acids (a.a.) S(645) and S(924) after ET treatment. Ju et al. (2012) then proved that CTR1 phosphorylates EIN2 at those positions and that the lack of phosphorylation at S(645) and S(924) leads to the translocation of an EIN2 C-terminus peptide. Wen et al. (2012) and Qiao et al. (2012) also demonstrated ET-induced translocation of an EIN2 C-terminus peptide, while Qiao et al. (2012) proved that EIN2 has a nuclear localization signal sequence required for translocation, confirmed phosphorylation at S(645) and said that proteolytic cleavage occurs at S(645) in absence of phosphorylation there. Despite the revelation of this elegant switch, there are contradictory indications for specific cleavage at EIN2 S(645). This article investigates the data and concludes that EIN2 may be cleaved at alternative positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.