Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23656828›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2013

Isolation of mycobacteria from clinical samples collected in the United States from 2004 to 2011.

Tyler C Thacker, Suelee Robbe-Austerman, Beth Harris, Mitchell Van Palmer, Wade Ray Waters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High female mortality caused by an atypicalThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2022
    Article
  6. SystemicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. DisseminatedJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2020
    Article
  9. Characteristics of subclinicalJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2019
    Article
  10. Use of the Human Vaccine,Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Identification ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tyler C ThackerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Infectious Bacterial Disease Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, USA. tyler.thacker@ars.usda.gov
Suelee Robbe-Austerman
Beth Harris
Mitchell Van Palmer
Wade Ray Waters

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycobacteria other than M. bovis may interfere with current bovine tuberculosis diagnostic tests resulting in false positive test results. As the prevalence of M. bovis decreases in the United States, interference from other mycobacteria play an increasingly important role in preventing the eradication of M. bovis. To identify mycobacteria other than M. bovis that may be interfering with current diagnostic tests, a retrospective study was performed to identify mycobacteria isolated from clinical tissues at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories between 1 January 2004 and 9 October 2011.

resultsDuring the study period, 2,366 mycobacteria other than M. bovis were isolated from samples submitted for clinical diagnosis of M. bovis. Fifty-five mycobacterial species were isolated during this time period. In cattle, M. avium complex, M. fortuitum/fortuitum complex, M. smegmatis, M. kansasii, and M. terrae complex were the predominate species other than M. bovis isolated from tissues submitted for culture. Mycobacteria other than M. bovis isolated from deer were predominantly M. avium complex, M. terrae/terrae complex, and M. fortuitum/fortuitum complex.

conclusionsThese data provide information characterizing the species and relative prevalence of mycobacteria other than M. bovis that may interfere with current diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCoinfectionDatabases, FactualDeerMycobacteriumMycobacterium bovisMycobacterium InfectionsPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesTuberculosis, BovineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23656828
PMCPMC3654946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.