Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23656707›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of nutrition2013

Postprandial lipid responses to standard carbohydrates used to determine glycaemic index values.

Sonia Vega-López, Lynne M Ausman, Nirupa R Matthan, Alice H Lichtenstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonia Vega-LópezHealthy Lifestyles Research Center, School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, 500 North 3rd Street, Phoenix AZ 85004, USA.
Lynne M Ausman
Nirupa R Matthan
Alice H Lichtenstein
Tufts University · USArizona State University · US

Funding

Evaluation of Glycemic Index to Assess Diet-Associated Chronic Disease RiskR01DK073321 · NIDDK · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI LICHTENSTEIN, ALICE H · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK073321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior studies assessing the metabolic effects of different types of carbohydrates have focused on their glycaemic response. However, the response of postprandial cardiometabolic risk indicators has not been considered in these studies. The present study assessed postprandial lipid responses to two forms of carbohydrates used as reference foods for glycaemic index determinations, white bread (50 g available carbohydrate) and glucose (50 g), under controlled conditions and with intra-individual replicate determinations. A total of twenty adults (20–70 years) underwent two cycles of challenges with each pair of reference foods (four challenges/person), administered in a random order on separate days under standard conditions. Serum lipids (total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, TAG and NEFA), glucose and insulin were monitored for 5 h post-ingestion. Oral glucose resulted in greater glycaemic and insulinaemic responses than white bread for the first 90 min and a greater subsequent decline after 120 min (P =0·0001). The initial decline in serum NEFA concentrations was greater after the oral glucose than after the white bread challenge, as was the rebound after 150 min (P = 0·001). Nevertheless, the type of carbohydrate had no significant effect on postprandial total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol concentrations. Following an initial modest rise in TAG concentrations in response to both challenges, the values dropped below the fasting values for oral glucose but not for the white bread challenge. These data suggest that the type of carbohydrate used to determine the glycaemic index, bread or glucose, has little or modest effects on postprandial plasma cholesterol concentrations. Differences in TAG and NEFA concentrations over the 5 h time period were modest, and their clinical relevance is unclear.

Indexed as

BreadGlycemic IndexAdultAgedBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDietDietary CarbohydratesFastingFatty Acids, NonesterifiedFemaleGlucoseHumansBlood GlucoseCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDietary CarbohydratesFatty Acids, NonesterifiedGlucoseInsulinLipidsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID23656707
PMCPMC4429602
OpenAlexW2029501975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.