Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23656622›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2013

The genomic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clinical implications.

Víctor Quesada, Andrew J Ramsay, David Rodríguez, Xose S Puente, Elías Campo, Carlos López-Otín

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Life science alliance · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Haematologica · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular pathogenesis of CLL and its evolution.International journal of hematology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Víctor QuesadaDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Universidad de Oviedo - IUOPA, Oviedo, Spain. quesadavictor@uniovi.es
Andrew J Ramsay
David Rodríguez
Xose S Puente
Elías Campo
Carlos López-Otín

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A precise understanding of the genomic and epigenomic features of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may benefit the study of the disease's staging and treatment. While recent reports have shed some light on these aspects, several challenges need to be addressed before translating this research into clinical practice. Thus, even the best candidate driver genes display low mutational rates compared to other tumors. This means that a large percentage of cases do not display clear tumor-driving point mutations, or show candidate driving point mutations with no obvious biochemical relationship to the more frequently mutated genes. This genomic landscape probably reflects either an unknown underlying biochemical mechanism playing a key role in CLL or multiple biochemical pathways independently driving the development of this tumor. The elucidation of either scenario will have important consequences on the clinical management of CLL. Herein, we review the recent advances in the definition of the genomic landscape of CLL and the ongoing research to characterize the underlying biochemical events that drive this disease.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticBiomedical ResearchHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellPoint Mutation

Identifiers

PMID23656622
PMCPMC3655884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.