ArticleSurgical neurology international2013
Developments on the horizon in the treatment of neurovascular problems.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of Cerebral Hemodynamics During Endovascular Aspiration: Development of an Experimental and Numerical Setup.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2023Article
- Apelin-36 Protects HT22 Cells Against Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation/Reperfusion-Induced Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction by Promoting SIRT1-Mediated PINK1/Parkin-Dependent Mitophagy.Neurotoxicity research · 2021Article
- The Role of Mitophagy in Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- Changing Management of Acute Ischaemic Stroke: the New Treatments and Emerging Role of Endovascular Therapy.Current treatment options in neurology · 2016Review
- Machine learning for outcome prediction of acute ischemic stroke post intra-arterial therapy.PloS one · 2014Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of Interventional Neuroradiology and Endovascular Neurosurgery has seen much technical advancement in the past two decades, which has brought the specialty from its infancy as an alternative therapy to the current standing as near standard of care for many complex neurovascular pathologies. This past year is no exception with flow diverting stents and stent retriever devices aiming to make their mark on advanced treatments for intracranial aneurysms and ischemic stroke, respectively. This review article will focus on the development of these technologies, current data supporting their advantages and limitations, and a brief expert opinion on where these technologies may take the field in the next few years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.