ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2013
Laparoscopic versus open multivisceral resection for primary colorectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes following open versus laparoscopic multi-visceral resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Pooled it
- Laparoscopic surgery should be a viable option for T4 colon cancer: evidence from a propensity score matching analysis.Updates in surgery · 2026Observational
- Benefits of a laparoscopic approach for second colorectal resection after colectomy or proctectomy -a retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Should be a locally advanced colon cancer still considered a contraindication to laparoscopic resection?Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for T4 colon cancer: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Feasibility and Outcomes of Multivisceral Resection in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center in North-East IndiaAnnals of coloproctology · 2021Article
- Wound infection in colorectal cancer resections through a laparoscopic approach: a single-center prospective observational study of over 3000 cases.Discover oncology · 2021Article
- Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy with multivisceral resection for surgical T4b colon cancer: Comparison with open colectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic multivisceral resection for locally advanced colon cancer: a single-center analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.Surgery today · 2020Article
- The Short- and Long-Term Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Colon Cancer Patients with Bulky Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Article
- Resection of the urinary bladder for locally advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of partial versus total cystectomy.BMC surgery · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic surgery facilitates administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer: propensity score analyses.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of clinical T4b tumours of distal sigmoid and rectum: initial results.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic multivisceral resection for locally advanced left colon cancer.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Multivisceral resections for locally advanced colorectal cancer after preoperative treatment.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2018Article
- Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.Techniques in coloproctology · 2017Article
- Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection for Clinically Suspected T4 Colon Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- The short-term outcomes of laparoscopic multivisceral resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer: our experience of 39 cases.Surgery today · 2017Article
- Clinically suspected T4 colorectal cancer may be resected using a laparoscopic approach.BMC cancer · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced colorectal cancer invading or adhering to neighboring organs is controversial. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer.
methodsThis study included 126 patients who underwent multivisceral resection for primary colorectal cancer invading or adhering to neighboring organs or structures between July 2005 and November 2012 at our institution. Perioperative outcomes were compared between laparoscopic and open resections.
resultsLaparoscopic and open multivisceral resections were performed in 60 and 66 patients, respectively. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 6.7 % of patients. The median operative time was significantly longer (271 vs. 227 min), but the median blood loss was significantly less (40 vs. 205 mL), in the laparoscopic compared with the open group. The R0 resection rate of the primary tumor (95 vs. 98.5 %), number of lymph nodes harvested (18 vs. 18), and postoperative complications (28 vs. 24 %) were comparable between the groups. The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (13.5 vs. 18 days) in the laparoscopic compared with the open group.
conclusionsLaparoscopic multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer invading or adhering to neighboring organs is safe and feasible in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23653376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.