Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23653268›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2013

Development of contrast-induced nephropathy in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single center perspective.

Bappaditya Ray, Kim L Rickert, Babu G Welch, Jonathan A White, Daniel R Klinger, Benjamin P Boudreaux, Brett A Whittemore, Eugene Gu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contrast-induced nephropathy: A dilemma between loss of neurons or nephrons in the setting of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bappaditya RayDivision of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurological Surgery and Neurology & Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA, docbappa@gmail.com.
Kim L Rickert
Babu G Welch
Jonathan A White
Daniel R Klinger
Benjamin P Boudreaux
Brett A Whittemore
Eugene Gu
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USNeurological Surgery · USSouthwestern Medical Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe use of iodinated contrast-enhanced imaging studies is increasing in acute cerebrovascular diseases, especially in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In SAH, such studies are essential for both diagnosis and treatment of the cause and sequela of hemorrhage. These patients are often subjected to multiple contrast studies such as computed tomographic angiography, computed tomographic perfusion, and cerebral angiography. They are also predisposed to intravascular volume depletion as a part of the disease process from cerebral salt wasting (CSW) and as a result of multiple contrast exposure can develop contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Data regarding CIN in this population are scarce. We aimed to examine the incidence of CIN in SAH and identify potential associative risk factors.

methodsWe analyzed data from a prospectively collected patient database of patients with SAH admitted to the neurocritical intensive care unit in a single center over a period of 1 year. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine by >1.5 times or >0.3 mg/dl greater than the admission value, or urine output <0.5 ml/kg/h during one 6-h block.

resultsIn this cohort of 75 patients with SAH who had undergone at least one contrast study, the mean age was 57.3 ± 15.6 years and 70.7% were women. Four percent developed CIN which resolved within 72 h and none required renal replacement therapy or dialysis. Patients older than 75 years (20%, p < 0.05), those with borderline renal function (14.3%, p = 0.26), diabetics (11.1%, p = 0.32), and those with lower recommended "maximum contrast dose" volume (33.3%, p = 0.12) had a trend toward development of CIN, although most were not statistically significant. Twenty-seven patients (36 %) were on 3% hypertonic saline (HTS) for CSW during the contrasted study but none developed CIN.

conclusionsThe incidence of CIN in SAH patients is comparable to previously published reports on non-neurological cohorts. No definite association was noted with any predisposing factors postulated to be responsible for CIN, except for advanced age. Concurrent use of 3% HTS was not associated with CIN in this population.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAdultAgedCerebral AngiographyCohort StudiesContrast MediaCreatinineCritical CareDatabases, FactualFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsContrast MediaCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID23653268
OpenAlexW2028485873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.