Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23653047›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2013

A semiphysiological population pharmacokinetic model for dynamic inhibition of liver and gut wall cytochrome P450 3A by voriconazole.

Sebastian Frechen, Lisa Junge, Teijo I Saari, Ahmed Abbas Suleiman, Dennis Rokitta, Pertti J Neuvonen, Klaus T Olkkola, Uwe Fuhr

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Voriconazole greatly increases the exposure to oral buprenorphine.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Interaction between atorvastatin and voriconazole in rat plasma: a HPLC-MS/MS-based study].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Voriconazole and the liver.World journal of hepatology · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian FrechenDepartment of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, Cologne University Hospital, Gleueler Str. 24, 50931, Köln, Germany. sebastian.frechen@uk-koeln.de
Lisa Junge
Teijo I Saari
Ahmed Abbas Suleiman
Dennis Rokitta
Pertti J Neuvonen
Klaus T Olkkola
Uwe Fuhr
University Hospital Cologne · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHelsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate predictions of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) account for dynamic changes of CYP3A activity at both major expression sites (liver and gut wall) by considering the full pharmacokinetic profile of the perpetrator and the substrate. Physiological-based in vitro-in vivo extrapolation models have become of increasing interest. However, due to discrepancies between the predicted and observed magnitude of DDIs, the role of models fully based on in vivo data is still essential.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to develop a coupled dynamic model for the interaction of the CYP3A inhibitor voriconazole and the prototypical CYP3A substrate midazolam.

methodsRaw concentration data were obtained from a DDI study. Ten subjects were given either no pretreatment (control) or voriconazole twice daily orally. Midazolam was given either intravenously or orally after the last voriconazole dose and during control phases. Data analysis was performed by the population pharmacokinetic approach using non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM 7.2.0). Model evaluation was performed using visual predictive checks and bootstrap analysis.

resultsA semiphysiological model was able to describe the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, its major metabolite and voriconazole simultaneously. By considering the temporal disposition of all three substances in the liver and gut wall, a time-varying CYP3A inhibition process was implemented. Only the incorporation of hypothetical enzyme site compartments resulted in an adequate fit, suggesting a sustained inhibitory effect through accumulation. Novel key features of this analysis are the identification of (1) an apparent sustained inhibitory effect by voriconazole due to a proposed quasi accumulation at the enzyme site, (2) a significantly reduced inhibitory potency of intravenous voriconazole for oral substrates, (3) voriconazole as a likely uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B inhibitor and (4) considerable sources of interindividual variability.

conclusionThe proposed semiphysiological modelling approach generated a mechanistic description of the complex DDI occurring at major CYP3A expression sites and thus may serve as a powerful tool to maximise information acquired from clinical DDI studies. The model has been shown to draw precise and accurate predictions. Therefore, simulations based on this kind of models may be used for various clinical scenarios to improve pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsModels, BiologicalAntifungal AgentsCross-Over StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP3ADrug InteractionsHumansLiverMaleMidazolamPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsCYP3A protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsMidazolamPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID23653047
OpenAlexW2084148758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.