Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23653012›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Insights into Chinese perspectives on do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders from an examination of DNR order form completeness for cancer patients.

Kuei-Yen Wen, Ya-Chin Lin, Ju-Feng Cheng, Pei-Chun Chou, Chih-Hsin Wei, Yun-Fang Chen, Jia-Ling Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Do-not-resuscitate orders in cancer patients: a review of literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Review
  14. Do-not-resuscitate consent signed by patients indicates a more favorable quality of end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Do-not-resuscitate orders and related factors among family surrogates of patients in the emergency department.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  17. Do-not-resuscitate orders among advanced-stage Chinese lung cancer patients who died in hospital.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kuei-Yen WenDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsinchu Branch, Taiwan.
Ya-Chin Lin
Ju-Feng Cheng
Pei-Chun Chou
Chih-Hsin Wei
Yun-Fang Chen
Jia-Ling Sun

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiscussing end-of-life care with patients is often considered taboo, and signing a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order is difficult for most patients, especially in Chinese culture. This study investigated distributions and details related to the signing of DNR orders, as well as the completeness of various DNR order forms.

methodsRetrospective chart reviews were performed. We screened all charts from a teaching hospital in Taiwan for patients who died of cancer during the period from January 2010 to December 2011. A total of 829 patient records were included in the analysis. The details of the DNR order forms were recorded.

resultsThe DNR order signing rate was 99.8%. The percentage of DNR orders signed by patients themselves (DNR-P) was 22.6%, while the percentage of orders signed by surrogates (DNR-S) was 77.2%. The percentage of signed DNR forms that were completely filled out was 78.4%. The percentage of DNR-S forms that were completed was 81.7%, while the percentage of DNR-P forms that were completely filled out was only 67.6%.

conclusionAlmost all the cancer patients had a signed DNR order, but for the majority of them, the order was signed by a surrogate. Negative attitudes of discussing death from medical professionals and/or the family members of patients may account for the higher number of signed DNR-S orders than DNR-P orders. Moreover, early obtainment of signed DNR orders should be sought, as getting the orders earlier could promote the quality of end-of-life care, especially in non-oncology wards.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleCommunicationFamilyFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CareResuscitation OrdersRetrospective StudiesTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID23653012
PMCPMC3728434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.