ArticleInternational journal of oncology2013
Analyses of the combination of 6-MP and dasatinib in cell culture.
Article in International journal of oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A major tenet of cancer therapeutics is that combinations of anticancer agents with different mechanisms of action and different toxicities may be effective treatment regimens. Evaluation of additivity/synergy in cell culture may be used to identify drug combination opportunities and to assess risk of additive/synergistic toxicity. The combination of 6-mercaptopurine and dasatinib was assessed for additivity/synergy using the combination index (CI) method and a response surface method in six human tumor cell lines including MCF-7 and MDA-MB‑468 breast cancer, NCI-H23 and NCI-H460 non‑small cell lung cancer, and A498 and 786-O renal cell cancer, based on two experimental end‑points: ATP content and colony formation. Clonal colony formation by human bone marrow CFU-GM was used to assess risk of enhanced toxicity. The concentration ranges tested for each drug were selected to encompass the clinical Cmax concentrations. The combination regimens were found to be additive to sub‑additive by both methods of data analysis, but synergy was not detected. The non-small cell lung cancer cell lines were the most responsive among the tumor lines tested and the renal cell carcinoma lines were the least responsive. The bone marrows CFU-GM were more sensitive to the combination regimens than were the tumor cell lines. Based upon these data, it appears that the possibility of enhanced efficacy from combining 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and dasatinib would be associated with increased risk of severe bone marrow toxicity, so the combination is unlikely to provide a therapeutic advantage for treating solid tumor patients where adequate bone marrow function must be preserved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.