Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23652844›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2013

Diffusion-weighted MRI in pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Raphael Richard, Isabelle Thomassin, Marion Chapellier, Aurélie Scemama, Patricia de Cremoux, Mariana Varna, Sylvie Giacchetti, Marc Espié, Eric de Kerviler, Cedric de Bazelaire

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Current Applications, Insights from Screening, and Future Directions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  16. Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  17. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Histopathologic Features, Genomics, and Treatment.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raphael RichardRadiology Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France. raphmed@hotmail.com
Isabelle Thomassin
Marion Chapellier
Aurélie Scemama
Patricia de Cremoux
Mariana Varna
Sylvie Giacchetti
Marc Espié
Eric de Kerviler
Cedric de Bazelaire
Hôpital Saint-Louis · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) provided by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) at baseline in patients according to their breast tumour phenotypes. MATERIALS &

methodsThis retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board. One hundred eighteen consecutive women with locally advanced breast cancer who had undergone NACT followed by breast surgery were included. DWI was performed at 1.5 T less than 2 weeks before NACT. We studied the correlation between pretreatment ADC and response in pathology after surgery according to immunohistochemical features and intrinsic subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative tumours).

resultsAfter surgery, the pathologist recognized 24 complete responders (CRps) and 94 non-complete responders (NCRps). No difference was identified between the pretreatment ADCs of the CRp and NCRp patients. There were differences in pretreatment ADCs among the luminal A (1.001 ± 0.143 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s), luminal B (0.983 ± 0.150 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s), HER2-enriched (1.132 ± 0.216 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s), and triple-negative (1.168 ± 0.245 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P = 0.0003) tumour subtypes. In triple-negative tumours, the pretreatment ADC was higher in NCRp (1.060 ± 0.143 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than in CRp patients (1.227 ± 0.271 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P = 0.047).

conclusionPretreatment ADC can predict the response of breast cancer to NACT if tumour subtypes are considered. Key Points • Apparent diffusion coefficient helps clinicians to assess patients with breast cancer. • Pretreatment ADC is related to tumour grade and hormone receptor status. • Pretreatment ADC is lower in luminal A and B than in triple-negative tumours. • Pretreatment ADC is higher in complete than in non-complete responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsDiffusionDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID23652844
OpenAlexW2024697399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.