Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23651936›Full record

ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2013

Developing a family-based HIV prevention intervention in rural Kenya: challenges in conducting community-based participatory research.

Eve S Puffer, Jessica Pian, Kathleen J Sikkema, Rose A Ogwang-Odhiambo, Sherryl A Broverman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Family Strengthening in the Context of COVID-19: Adapting a Community-Based Intervention from Kenya to the United States.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eve S PufferDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. eve.puffer@duke.edu
Jessica Pian
Kathleen J Sikkema
Rose A Ogwang-Odhiambo
Sherryl A Broverman

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-Based Participatory research (CBPR) introduces new ethical challenges for HIV prevention studies in low-resource international settings. We describe a CBPR study in rural Kenya to develop and pilot a family-based HIV prevention and mental health promotion intervention. Academic partners (APs) worked with a community advisory committee (CAC) during formative research, intervention development, and a pilot trial. Ethical challenges emerged related to: negotiating power imbalances between APs and the CAC; CAC members' shifting roles as part of the CAC and wider community; and anticipated challenges in decision making about sustainability. Factors contributing to ethical dilemmas included low access to education, scarcity of financial resources, and the shortage of HIV-related services despite high prevalence.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesCommunity-Institutional RelationsMental HealthCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity NetworksCooperative BehaviorDecision MakingFamilyHealth PromotionHealth ResourcesHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaPower, PsychologicalPreventive Health ServicesResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID23651936
PMCPMC3743433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.