ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2013
National estimates of central line-associated bloodstream infections in critical care patients.
Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing and validating a home-infusion central-line-associated bloodstream infection surveillance definition.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023Article
- Can inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) be used to assess differences of CRBSI rates between non-tunneled femoral and jugular CVCs in PICU patients?BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Oesophageal carcinoma: The prevalence of DNA tumour viruses and therapy.Tumour virus research · 2022Review
- Case report and literature review: double jeopardy -Access microbiology · 2022Article
- Trends in Incidence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections Differ by Strain Type and Healthcare Exposure, United States, 2005-2013.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Article
- Variation in Identifying Sepsis and Organ Dysfunction Using Administrative Versus Electronic Clinical Data and Impact on Hospital Outcome Comparisons.Critical care medicine · 2019Article
- A new frontier: Central line-associated bloodstream infection surveillance in home infusion therapy.American journal of infection control · 2018Article
- Fifteen years after To Err is Human: a success story to learn from.BMJ quality & safety · 2016Article
- The Likelihood of Hospital Readmission Among Patients With Hospital-Onset Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2015Article
- Article
- Article
- The association of state legal mandates for data submission of central line-associated bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care units with process and outcome measures.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2014Article
- CDC central-line bloodstream infection prevention efforts produced net benefits of at least $640 Million during 1990-2008.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2014Article
- Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program.Implementation science : IS · 2013Article
- Formative Evaluation of CLABSI Adoption and Sustainment Interventions in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledOBJECTIVE. Recent studies have demonstrated that central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are preventable through implementation of evidence-based prevention practices. Hospitals have reported CLABSI data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) since the 1970s, providing an opportunity to characterize the national impact of CLABSIs over time. Our objective was to describe changes in the annual number of CLABSIs in critical care patients in the United States.
designMonte Carlo simulation. Setting. U.S. acute care hospitals. PATIENTS: Nonneonatal critical care patients.
methodsWe obtained administrative data on patient-days for nearly all US hospitals and applied CLABSI rates from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance and the National Healthcare Safety Network systems to estimate the annual number of CLABSIs in critical care patients nationally during the period 1990-2010 and the number of CLABSIs prevented since 1990.
resultsWe estimated that there were between 462,000 and 636,000 CLABSIs in nonneonatal critical care patients in the United States during 1990-2010. CLABSI rate reductions led to between 104,000 and 198,000 fewer CLABSIs than would have occurred if rates had remained unchanged since 1990. There were 15,000 hospital-onset CLABSIs in nonneonatal critical care patients in 2010; 70% occurred in medium and large teaching hospitals.
conclusionsSubstantial progress has been made in reducing the occurrence of CLABSIs in U.S. critical care patients over the past 2 decades. The concentration of critical care CLABSIs in medium and large teaching hospitals suggests that a targeted approach may be warranted to continue achieving reductions in critical care CLABSIs nationally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.