Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23651875›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacological and toxicological methods

Variability in high-throughput ion-channel screening data and consequences for cardiac safety assessment.

Ryan C Elkins, Mark R Davies, Stephen J Brough, David J Gavaghan, Yi Cui, Najah Abi-Gerges, Gary R Mirams

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A systematic review of cardiacProgress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. When Does the ICJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan C ElkinsGlobal Safety Pharmacology, Global Safety Assessment, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, UK.
Mark R Davies
Stephen J Brough
David J Gavaghan
Yi Cui
Najah Abi-Gerges
Gary R Mirams
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K001337/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnwanted drug interactions with ionic currents in the heart can lead to an increased pro-arrhythmic risk to patients in the clinic. It is therefore a priority for safety pharmacology teams to detect block of cardiac ion channels, and new technologies have enabled the development of automated and high-throughput screening assays using cell lines. As a result of screening multiple ion-channels there is a need to integrate information, particularly for compounds affecting more than one current, and mathematical electrophysiology in-silico action potential models are beginning to be used for this.

methodsWe quantified the variability associated with concentration-effect curves fitted to recordings from high-throughput Molecular Devices IonWorks® Quattro™ screens when detecting block of I(Kr) (hERG), I(Na) (NaV1.5), I(CaL) (CaV1.2), I(Ks) (KCNQ1/minK) and I(to) (Kv4.3/KChIP2.2), and the Molecular Devices FLIPR® Tetra fluorescence screen for I(CaL) (CaV1.2), for control compounds used at AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. We examined how screening variability propagates through in-silico action potential models for whole cell electrical behaviour, and how confidence intervals on model predictions can be estimated with repeated simulations.

resultsThere are significant levels of variability associated with high-throughput ion channel electrophysiology screens. This variability is of a similar magnitude for different cardiac ion currents and different compounds. Uncertainty in the Hill coefficients of reported concentration-effect curves is particularly high. Depending on a compound's ion channel blocking profile, the uncertainty introduced into whole-cell predictions can become significant. DISCUSSION: Our technique allows confidence intervals to be placed on computational model predictions that are based on high-throughput ion channel screens. This allows us to suggest when repeated screens should be performed to reduce uncertainty in a compound's action to acceptable levels, to allow a meaningful interpretation of the data.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, TheoreticalAction PotentialsCell LineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DesignHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansIon ChannelsMyocytes, CardiacPatch-Clamp TechniquesToxicity TestsIon ChannelsAction potentialAction Potential (Duration)AP(D)AstraZenecaAZCardiac safetyCompound screeningConcentration for 50% Inhibitionfast sodium current[fast] transient outward potassium currentFLIPRFLuorometric Imaging Plate ReaderGlaxoSmithKlineGSKHigh-throughputHigh Throughput Screening [assays]HTSIC(50)I(CaL)I(Kr)I(Ks)I(Na)I(to)L-type calcium currentMathematical modelminus log(10) of IC(50)PDFpIC(50)Population Patch ClampingPPCProbability Density FunctionQT(c)QTinterval of the electrocardiogram (corrected for heart rate)rapid delayed rectifier potassium currentslow delayed rectifier potassium currentTen Tusscher and Panfilov (2006) human ventricular cell modelThorough QT, human clinical QT prolongation trialTQTTT06UncertaintyVariability

Identifiers

PMID23651875
PMCPMC4135079
OpenAlexW2024014455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.