Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23650505›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

A randomized, observer-blinded immunogenicity trial of Cervarix(®) and Gardasil(®) Human Papillomavirus vaccines in 12-15 year old girls.

Eve Draper, Sara L Bissett, Rebecca Howell-Jones, Pauline Waight, Kate Soldan, Mark Jit, Nicholas Andrews, Elizabeth Miller, Simon Beddows

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00956553 (A Phase IV, Randomised Study to Evaluate the Immune Responses of UK Adolescent Girls Receiving CervarixTM or GardasilTM Human Papillomavirus Vaccines), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00956553 phase4completednot on this map

A Phase IV, Randomised Study to Evaluate the Immune Responses of UK Adolescent Girls Receiving CervarixTM or GardasilTM Human Papillomavirus Vaccines

TypeinterventionalSponsorPublic Health EnglandRan2009 to 2013Enrolled400ConditionsHPV InfectionsArmsCervarix, Gardasil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Immune Responses to Human Papillomavirus After Infection and Vaccination.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  16. UnveilingiScience · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Serosurveillance to Support HPV Vaccination in England.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eve DraperVirus Reference Department, Health Protection Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Sara L Bissett
Rebecca Howell-Jones
Pauline Waight
Kate Soldan
Mark Jit
Nicholas Andrews
Elizabeth Miller
Simon Beddows

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0701217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current generation of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Cervarix® and Gardasil®, exhibit a high degree of efficacy in clinical trials against the two high-risk (HR) genotypes represented in the vaccines (HPV16 and HPV18). High levels of neutralizing antibodies are elicited against the vaccine types, consistent with preclinical data showing that neutralizing antibodies can mediate type-specific protection in the absence of other immune effectors. The vaccines also confer protection against some closely related non-vaccine HR HPV types, although the vaccines appear to differ in their degree of cross-protection. The mechanism of vaccine-induced cross-protection is unknown. This study sought to compare the breadth and magnitudes of neutralizing antibodies against non-vaccine types elicited by both vaccines and establish whether such antibodies could be detected in the genital secretions of vaccinated individuals. METHODS AND

findingsSerum and genital samples were collected from 12-15 year old girls following vaccination with either Cervarix® (n = 96) or Gardasil® (n = 102) HPV vaccine. Serum-neutralizing antibody responses against non-vaccine HPV types were broader and of higher magnitude in the Cervarix®, compared to the Gardasil®, vaccinated individuals. Levels of neutralizing and binding antibodies in genital secretions were closely associated with those found in the serum (r = 0.869), with Cervarix® having a median 2.5 (inter-quartile range, 1.7-3.5) fold higher geometric mean HPV-specific IgG ratio in serum and genital samples than Gardasil® (p = 0.0047). There was a strong positive association between cross-neutralizing antibody seropositivity and available HPV vaccine trial efficacy data against non-vaccine types.

conclusionsThese data demonstrate for the first time that cross-neutralizing antibodies can be detected at the genital site of infection and support the possibility that cross-neutralizing antibodies play a role in the cross-protection against HPV infection and disease that has been reported for the current HPV vaccines.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00956553.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18HumansPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccinationVaginal SmearsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHuman Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18human papillomavirus vaccine, L1 type 16, 18Papillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23650505
PMCPMC3641072
OpenAlexW2056922374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.