ArticleApplied clinical informatics2013
Monitoring adherence to evidence-based practices: a method to utilize HL7 messages from hospital information systems.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-Driven Guideline Adherence in Data Representation and Compliance Measurement: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- A Pragmatic Pilot Trial Comparing Patient-Triggered Adaptive Pressure Control to Patient-Triggered Volume Control Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults.Respiratory care · 2023Article
- Design and Development of an Objective Evaluation System for a Web-Based Simulator for Trauma Management.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Excess Tidal Volume Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults Receiving Adaptive Pressure Control: A Cohort Study.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2022Article
- A scoping review of medical practice variation research within the informatics literature.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Development of population-level colon cancer pathway concordance measures and association with survival.International journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Evaluating Neonatal Telehealth Programs Using the STEM Framework.Seminars in perinatology · 2021Article
- Modified Needleman-Wunsch algorithm for clinical pathway clustering.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- Just in Time Radiology Decision Support Using Real-time Data Feeds.Journal of digital imaging · 2020Article
- Integration of Clinical Decision Support and Electronic Clinical Quality Measurement: Domain Expert Insights and Implications for Future Direction.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical pathways are evidence-based recommendations for treating a diagnosis. Although implementations of clinical pathways have reduced medical errors, lowered costs, and improved patient outcomes, monitoring whether a patient is following the intended pathway is problematic. Implementing a variance reporting program is impeded by the lack of a reliable source of electronic data and automatic retrieval methods.
objectivesOur objective is to develop an automated method of measuring and reporting patient variance from a clinical pathway.
methodsWe identify a viable and ubiquitous data source for establishing the realized patient's path- Health Level Seven (HL7) formatted message exchanges between Hospital Information Systems. This is in contrast to current practices in most hospitals where data for clinical pathway variance reporting is obtained from multiple data sources, often retrospectively. This paper develops a method to use message exchanges to automatically establish and compare a patient's path against a clinical pathway. Our method not only considers pathway activities as is common practice, but also extracts patient outcomes from HL7 messages and reports this in addition to the variance.
resultsUsing data from our partner hospital, we illustrate our clinical pathway variance analysis tool using major joint replacement patients. We validate our method by comparing audit results for a random sample of HL7 constructed pathways with data extracted from patient charts. We report several variances such as omitted laboratory tests or additional activities such as blood transfusions. Our method successfully identifies variances and reports them in a quantified way to support decisions related to quality control.
conclusionsOUR APPROACH DIFFERS FROM PREVIOUS STUDIES IN THAT A QUANTITATIVE MEASURE IS ESTABLISHED OVER THREE DIMENSIONS: (1) omissions from the pathway, (2) additions to the pathway, and (3) patient outcomes. By examining variances providers can evaluate clinical decisions, and support quality feedback and training mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.