Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23650470›Full record

ArticleJournal of central nervous system disease2012

New and Emerging Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: What is New and What is to Come.

J Nicholas, B Morgan-Followell, D Pitt, M K Racke, A Boster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of central nervous system disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Uveitis in multiple sclerosis : Overview and perspectives].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2014
    Review
  5. Monoclonal antibodies in treatment of multiple sclerosis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J NicholasThe Ohio State University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-immunology, Columbus, Ohio.
B Morgan-Followell
D Pitt
M K Racke
A Boster

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic landscape for multiple sclerosis (MS) is rapidly changing. Currently, there are eight FDA approved disease modifying therapies for MS including: IFN-β-1a (Avonex, Rebif), IFN-β-1b (Betaseron, Extavia), glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), mitoxantrone (Novantrone), natalizumab (Tysabri), and fingolimod (Gilenya). This review will highlight the experience to date and key clinical trials of the newest FDA approved agents, natalizumab and fingolimod. It will also review available efficacy and safety data on several promising therapies under active investigation including four monoclonal antibody therapies: alemtuzumab, daclizumab, ocrelizumab and ofatumumab and three oral agents: BG12, laquinimod, and teriflunomide. To conclude, we will discuss where each of these new therapies may best fit into treatment algorithms.

Indexed as

alemtuzumabBG12daclizumabfingolimodlaquinimod, and teriflunomidemultiple sclerosisnatalizumabocrelizumabofatumumabtreatment

Identifiers

PMID23650470
PMCPMC3619700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.