Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23650347›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Retargeting of the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cyt2Aa against hemipteran insect pests.

Nanasaheb P Chougule, Huarong Li, Sijun Liu, Lucas B Linz, Kenneth E Narva, Thomas Meade, Bryony C Bonning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CanPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cry1Ba1-mediated toxicity of transgenicFrontiers in insect science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Genetic Modification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Toxicity ofToxins · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nanasaheb P ChouguleDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Huarong Li
Sijun Liu
Lucas B Linz
Kenneth E Narva
Thomas Meade
Bryony C Bonning

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins have been used successfully for management of lepidopteran and coleopteran pest species, the sap-sucking insects (Hemiptera) are not particularly susceptible to Bt toxins. To overcome this limitation, we demonstrate that addition of a short peptide sequence selected for binding to the gut of the targeted pest species serves to increase toxicity against said pest. Insertion of a 12-aa pea aphid gut-binding peptide by adding to or replacing amino acids in one of three loops of the Bt cytolytic toxin, Cyt2Aa, resulted in enhanced binding and toxicity against both the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, and the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. This strategy may allow for transgenic plant-mediated suppression of other hemipteran pests, which include some of the most important pests of global agriculture.

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensisBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsInsecticidesAnimalsAphidsBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsIntestinal MucosaIntestinesLarvaPest Control, BiologicalBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteinsinsecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus ThuringiensisInsecticidesaphid managementbiotechnologyinsect resistance

Identifiers

PMID23650347
PMCPMC3666667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.