Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23650297›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2013

Effectiveness of decision support for families, clinicians, or both on HPV vaccine receipt.

Alexander G Fiks, Robert W Grundmeier, Stephanie Mayne, Lihai Song, Kristen Feemster, Dean Karavite, Cayce C Hughes, James Massey, Ron Keren, Louis M Bell and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 126 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02551887 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

HPV Vaccination: An Investigation of Physician Reminders and Recommendation Scripts

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegenstrief Institute, Inc.Ran2014 to 2015Enrolled647ConditionsHuman Papilloma Virus Infection Type 11, Human Papilloma Virus Infection Type 16, Human Papilloma Virus Infection Type 18, Human Papilloma Virus Infection Type 6ArmsAutomated Reminder, Automated Reminder Plus Script
NCT02558803 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

HPV Vaccination: Evaluation of Reminder Prompts for Doses 2 & 3

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegenstrief Institute, Inc.Ran2015 to 2016Enrolled1,305ConditionsHuman Papilloma Virus Infection Type 11, Human Papilloma Virus Infection Type 16, Human Papilloma Virus Infection Type 18, Human Papilloma Virus Infection Type 6ArmsSimple Reminder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 214 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. TeenVac.org: A Mobile Web App to Improve Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake for Adolescent Boys.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Impact of a Multi-Level, Multi-Component, System Intervention on HPV Vaccination in a Federally Qualified Health Center.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Centralized Reminder/Recall for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Findings From Two States-A Randomized Clinical Trial.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  20. Trial

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander G FiksThe Pediatric Research Consortium, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. fiks@email.chop.edu
Robert W Grundmeier
Stephanie Mayne
Lihai Song
Kristen Feemster
Dean Karavite
Cayce C Hughes
James Massey
Ron Keren
Louis M Bell
Richard Wasserman
A Russell Localio
Clinical Research Consortium · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Shared Decision Making in ADHDK23HD059919 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI FIKS, ALEXANDER GABRIEL · 2009 to 2013
$631k
National Center for Pediatric Practice Based Research & LearningP30HS021645 · AHRQ · AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS · PI FIKS, ALEXANDER GABRIEL · 2012 to 2016
$599k
AHRQ HHS P30 HS021645NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD059919NICHD NIH HHS K23HD059919PHS HHS HHSA 290-07-10013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo improve human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates, we studied the effectiveness of targeting automated decision support to families, clinicians, or both.

methodsTwenty-two primary care practices were cluster-randomized to receive a 3-part clinician-focused intervention (education, electronic health record-based alerts, and audit and feedback) or none. Overall, 22, 486 girls aged 11 to 17 years due for HPV vaccine dose 1, 2, or 3 were randomly assigned within each practice to receive family-focused decision support with educational telephone calls. Randomization established 4 groups: family-focused, clinician-focused, combined, and no intervention. We measured decision support effectiveness by final vaccination rates and time to vaccine receipt, standardized for covariates and limited to those having received the previous dose for HPV #2 and 3. The 1-year study began in May 2010.

resultsFinal vaccination rates for HPV #1, 2, and 3 were 16%, 65%, and 63% among controls. The combined intervention increased vaccination rates by 9, 8, and 13 percentage points, respectively. The control group achieved 15% vaccination for HPV #1 and 50% vaccination for HPV #2 and 3 after 318, 178, and 215 days. The combined intervention significantly accelerated vaccination by 151, 68, and 93 days. The clinician-focused intervention was more effective than the family-focused intervention for HPV #1, but less effective for HPV #2 and 3.

conclusionsA clinician-focused intervention was most effective for initiating the HPV vaccination series, whereas a family-focused intervention promoted completion. Decision support directed at both clinicians and families most effectively promotes HPV vaccine series receipt.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsFamilyFemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPhysiciansPhysicians, Primary CarePapillomavirus Vaccinesdecision support systemselectronic recordsimmunizations

Identifiers

PMID23650297
PMCPMC3666111
OpenAlexW2060430759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.