ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013
Fetal safety of macrolides.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prenatal Exposure to Macrolides and Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Meta-Analysis.Drug safety · 2020Pooled it
- Association between exposure to macrolides and the development of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2019Pooled it
- The association of prenatal and postnatal macrolide exposure with subsequent development of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2019Pooled it
- Associations between use of macrolide antibiotics during pregnancy and adverse child outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Prenatal Azithromycin Exposure and Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Article
- Treatments for COVID-19 and acute respiratory infections are associated with gender and comorbidities in an Italian online survey.PloS one · 2026Article
- Antibiotic Considerations in the Treatment of Maternal Sepsis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Azithromycin prevents implantation failure via up-regulation of leukemia inhibitory factor in endotoxemic pregnant rats.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Article
- News in pharmacology for the main medical pathologies of gestation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Use of Azithromycin in Pregnancy: More Doubts than Certainties.Clinical drug investigation · 2022Review
- Pattern of Antibiotic Use in the Perinatal Period in a Public University Hospital in Romania.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Exogenous Semaphorin 3E treatment protects against chlamydial lung infection in mice.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Use of Antibiotic Treatment in Pregnancy and the Risk of Several Neonatal Outcomes: A Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Association between use of macrolides in pregnancy and risk of major birth defects: nationwide, register based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Antibiotic use amongst pregnant women in a public hospital in KwaZulu-Natal.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2021Article
- Warning of Immortal Time Bias When Studying Drug Safety in Pregnancy: Application to Late Use of Antibiotics and Preterm Delivery.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Observational
- Autophagy induction and PDGFR-β knockdown by siRNA-encapsulated nanoparticles reduce chlamydia trachomatis infection.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Use of antibiotics during pregnancy and the risk of major congenital malformations: a population based cohort study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Therapeutic Approaches for Zika Virus Infection of the Nervous System.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macrolide antibiotics are largely used in pregnancy for different bacterial infections. Their fetal safety has been studied by several groups, yielding opposing results. In particular, there have been studies claiming an association between macrolides and cardiovascular malformations. Exposure in early infancy has been associated with pyloric stenosis and intussusception. This has led to an avoidance in prescribing macrolides to pregnant women in several Scandinavian countries. The Objectives of the present study was to investigate the fetal safety of this class of drug by linking a large administrative database of drug dispensing and pregnancy outcome in Southern Israel. A computerized database of medications dispensed from 1999 to 2009 to all women registered in the Clalit health maintenance organization in southern Israel was linked with two computerized databases containing maternal and infant hospitalization records. Also, medical pregnancy termination data were analyzed. The following confounders were controlled for: maternal age, ethnicity, maternal pregestational diabetes, parity, and the year the mother gave birth or went through medical pregnancy termination. First- and third-trimester exposures to macrolide antibiotics as a group and to individual drugs were analyzed. During the study period there were 105,492 pregnancies among Clalit women that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 104,380 ended in live births or dead fetuses and 1,112 in abortion due to medical reasons. In the first trimester of pregnancy, 1,033 women were exposed to macrolides. There was no association between macrolides and either major malformations [odds ratio (OR), 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84 to 1.38)] or specific malformations, after accounting for maternal age, parity, ethnicity, prepregnancy diabetes, and year of exposure. During the third trimester of pregnancy, 959 women were exposed to macrolides. There was no association between such exposure and perinatal mortality, low birth weight, low Apgar score, or preterm delivery. Similarly, no associations were demonstrated with pyloric stenosis or intussusception. Use of macrolides in the first trimester of pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of major malformations. Exposure in the third trimester is not likely to increase neonatal risks for pyloric stenosis or intussusception in a clinically meaningful manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.