Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23650048›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2013

Estimation of causal mediation effects for a dichotomous outcome in multiple-mediator models using the mediation formula.

Wei Wang, Suchitra Nelson, Jeffrey M Albert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gene-based mediation analysis in epigenetic studies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Design-based single-mediator approach for complex survey data.Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine WG-37, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Suchitra Nelson
Jeffrey M Albert

Funding

Generalized Causal Mediation Analysis for Social Environment and Health ResearchR01DE022674 · NIDCR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERT, JEFFREY M · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
Oral Health Problems of BPD and VLBW adolescentsR21DE016469 · NIDCR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI NELSON, SUCHITRA S · 2004 to 2005
$421k
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022674NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE022674NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE016469NIDCR NIH HHS R21-DE16469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mediators are intermediate variables in the causal pathway between an exposure and an outcome. Mediation analysis investigates the extent to which exposure effects occur through these variables, thus revealing causal mechanisms. In this paper, we consider the estimation of the mediation effect when the outcome is binary and multiple mediators of different types exist. We give a precise definition of the total mediation effect as well as decomposed mediation effects through individual or sets of mediators using the potential outcomes framework. We formulate a model of joint distribution (probit-normal) using continuous latent variables for any binary mediators to account for correlations among multiple mediators. A mediation formula approach is proposed to estimate the total mediation effect and decomposed mediation effects based on this parametric model. Estimation of mediation effects through individual or subsets of mediators requires an assumption involving the joint distribution of multiple counterfactuals. We conduct a simulation study that demonstrates low bias of mediation effect estimators for two-mediator models with various combinations of mediator types. The results also show that the power to detect a nonzero total mediation effect increases as the correlation coefficient between two mediators increases, whereas power for individual mediation effects reaches a maximum when the mediators are uncorrelated. We illustrate our approach by applying it to a retrospective cohort study of dental caries in adolescents with low and high socioeconomic status. Sensitivity analysis is performed to assess the robustness of conclusions regarding mediation effects when the assumption of no unmeasured mediator-outcome confounders is violated.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, StatisticalAdolescentCohort StudiesComputer SimulationDental CariesHumansRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Factorsdecomposed mediation effectslatent variablesmediation analysismediation formulamultiple mediatorsoverall mediation effectsensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID23650048
PMCPMC3789850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.