Observational studyHeart and vessels2014
The late-phase inflammatory response after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of drug-eluting balloon (pre- or post-) dilation on neointima formation in de novo lesions treated by bare-metal stent: the IN-PACT CORO trial.Heart and vessels · 2016Trial
- Co-release of cytokines after drug-eluting stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction patients with PCI.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- SGLT2 inhibitor improves the prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease and prevents in-stent restenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Five-year comparative study of thin-strut rapamycin-eluting bioabsorbable scaffold with metallic drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary artery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Neointimal tissue characterization after implantation of drug-eluting stents by optical coherence tomography: quantitative analysis of optical density.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
- Association between high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and/or microembolic signals after carotid angioplasty and stenting.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2019Article
- Initial and late efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents for small and non-small coronary lesions from evaluating delayed late loss study.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
- Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.Heart and vessels · 2016Observational
- Comparison of the performance of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents by optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy.Heart and vessels · 2016Article
- The wound healing response after implantation of a drug-eluting stent is impaired persistently in the long term.Heart and vessels · 2016Article
- Short- and long-term benefits of drug-eluting stents compared to bare metal stents even in treatment for large coronary arteries.Heart and vessels · 2016Article
- Does really previous stenting affect graft patency following CABG? A 5-year follow-up: The effect of PCI on graft survival.Heart and vessels · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology have succeeded in preventing restenosis. In addition to inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation, DES greatly inhibits the local inflammatory response in the acute phase after implantation, leading to prevention of restenosis. However, a unique issue in DES implantation is an impairment of reendothelialization, which may result in abnormal wound healing. Consequently, a late-phase inflammatory relapse could appear in the long term after DES implantation. In this study, we measured serum levels of inflammatory markers, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and myeloperoxidase, as well as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein at follow-up coronary angiography (mean 9 months) in 54 patients who received DES stenting who did not experience restenosis, and compared them with 51 patients receiving bare-metal stents (BMS) without restenosis. The level of IL-6 was over the measurement threshold (≥2.22 pg/ml) in 12 patients (21 %) in the DES group, but in only 2 patients (4 %) in the BMS group (P = 0.003). IL-8 was significantly higher in the DES group than in the BMS group (4.51 ± 2.40 vs 3.84 ± 1.34 pg/ml, P = 0.015). The levels of other biomarkers were similar between the two groups. DES showed an increase in inflammatory cytokines in the late phase after implantation in comparison with patients who received BMS, suggesting late-stage inflammation. Therefore, the wound-healing response after DES implantation might be different from that after BMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.