Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23649886›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

A survey of educational uses of molecular visualization freeware.

Paul A Craig, Lea Vacca Michel, Robert C Bateman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An expanded framework for biomolecular visualization in the classroom: Learning goals and competencies.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2017
    Article
  3. Simplifying and enhancing the use of PyMOL with horizontal scripts.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016
    Article
  4. A Review on the Bioinformatics Tools for Neuroimaging.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A survey of educational uses of molecular visualization freeware.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul A CraigRochester Institute of Technology, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. pac8612@rit.edu
Lea Vacca Michel
Robert C Bateman
Rochester Institute of Technology · USWestern University of Health Sciences · US

Funding

SBEVSL -- Structural Biology Extensible Visualization Scripting LanguageR15GM078077 · NIGMS · DOWLING COLLEGE · PI BERNSTEIN, HERBERT J., CRAIG, PAUL A · 2006 to 2014
$855k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM078077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As biochemists, one of our most captivating teaching tools is the use of molecular visualization. It is a compelling medium that can be used to communicate structural information much more effectively with interactive animations than with static figures. We have conducted a survey to begin a systematic evaluation of the current classroom usage of molecular visualization. Participants (n = 116) were asked to complete 11 multiple choice and 3 open ended questions. To provide more depth to these results, interviews were conducted with 12 of the participants. Many common themes arose in the survey and the interviews: a shared passion for the use of molecular visualization in teaching, broad diversity in software preference, the lack of uniform standards for assessment, a desire for more quality resources, and the challenge of enabling students to incorporate visualization in their learning. The majority of respondents had used molecular visualization for more than 5 years and mentioned 32 different visualization tools used, with Jmol and PyMOL clearly standing out as the most frequently used programs at the present time. The most common uses of molecular visualization in teaching were lecture and lab illustrations, followed by exam questions, in-class or in-laboratory exercises, and student projects, which frequently included presentations. While a minority of instructors used a grading rubric/scoring matrix for assessment of student learning with molecular visualization, many expressed a desire for common use assessment tools.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationData CollectionSoftwareTeachingBiochemistryFacultyHumansModels, MolecularProblem-Based LearningResearch DesignStudents

Identifiers

PMID23649886
PMCPMC4098825
OpenAlexW1599668181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.