Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23649885›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2013

Pharmacological traits of delta opioid receptors: pitfalls or opportunities?

Richard M van Rijn, Julia N Defriel, Jennifer L Whistler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Indole Alkaloids as Biased Opioid Receptor Modulators.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification of 1,3,8-Triazaspiro[4.5]Decane-2,4-Dione Derivatives as a NovelThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Inflammation-associated changes in DOR expression and function in the mouse colon.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Delta Opioid Pharmacology in Relation to Alcohol Behaviors.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Molecular Pharmacology of δ-Opioid Receptors.Pharmacological reviews · 2016
    Review
  18. Agonist-Specific Recruitment of Arrestin Isoforms Differentially Modify Delta Opioid Receptor Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard M van RijnErnest Gallo Clinic and Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, 5858 Horton St., Suite 200, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA. rvanrijn@gallo.ucsf.edu
Julia N Defriel
Jennifer L Whistler
Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Vector, Transgenic, and Imaging CoreP50AA017072 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RON, DORIT · 2008 to 2017
$13.9M
Trafficking and signaling of opioid receptor subtypes and heterodimersR01DA015232 · NIDA · ERNEST GALLO CLINIC AND RESEARCH CENTER · PI WHISTLER, JENNIFER L · 2003 to 2010
$2.0M
Role of opioid receptor trafficking in tolerance and dependenceR01DA019958 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WHISTLER, JENNIFER L · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
Selectively targeting delta opioid receptor subtypes to control drinking behaviorR01AA020401 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WHISTLER, JENNIFER L · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Development of a preclinical candidate for the treatment of alcoholismK99AA020539 · NIAAA · ERNEST GALLO CLINIC AND RESEARCH CENTER · PI VAN RIJN, RICHARD M. · 2011 to 2012
$178k
NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA020539NIAAA NIH HHS K99AA020539NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA017072NIAAA NIH HHS P50AA017072-03NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020401NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA020401NIDA NIH HHS DA019958NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015232NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDelta opioid receptors (DORs) have been considered as a potential target to relieve pain as well as treat depression and anxiety disorders and are known to modulate other physiological responses, including ethanol and food consumption. A small number of DOR-selective drugs are in clinical trials, but no DOR-selective drugs have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration and some candidates have failed in phase II clinical trials, highlighting current difficulties producing effective delta opioid-based therapies. Recent studies have provided new insights into the pharmacology of the DOR, which is often complex and at times paradoxical.

objectiveThis review will discuss the existing literature focusing on four aspects: (1) Two DOR subtypes have been postulated based on differences in pharmacological effects of existing DOR-selective ligands. (2) DORs are expressed ubiquitously throughout the body and central nervous system and are, thus, positioned to play a role in a multitude of diseases. (3) DOR expression is often dynamic, with many reports of increased expression during exposure to chronic stimuli, such as stress, inflammation, neuropathy, morphine, or changes in endogenous opioid tone. (4) A large structural variety in DOR ligands implies potential different mechanisms of activating the receptor.

conclusionThe reviewed features of DOR pharmacology illustrate the potential benefit of designing tailored or biased DOR ligands.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansLigandsMolecular Targeted TherapyReceptors, Opioid, deltaAnalgesics, OpioidLigandsReceptors, Opioid, delta

Identifiers

PMID23649885
PMCPMC3679311
OpenAlexW2040911324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.