Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23649729›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2013

Designing user interfaces to enhance human interpretation of medical content-based image retrieval: application to PET-CT images.

Ashnil Kumar, Jinman Kim, Lei Bi, Michael Fulham, Dagan Feng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashnil KumarBiomedical and Multimedia Information Technology (BMIT) Research Group, School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, ashnil@it.usyd.edu.au.
Jinman Kim
Lei Bi
Michael Fulham
Dagan Feng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContent-based image retrieval (CBIR) in medicine has been demonstrated to improve evidence-based diagnosis, education, and teaching. However, the low clinical adoption of CBIR is partially because the focus of most studies has been the development of feature extraction and similarity measurement algorithms with limited work on facilitating better understanding of the similarity between complex volumetric and multi-modality medical images. In this paper, we present a method for defining user interfaces (UIs) that enable effective human user interpretation of retrieved images.

methodsWe derived a set of visualisation and interaction requirements based on the characteristics of modern volumetric medical images. We implemented a UI that visualised multiple views of a single image, displayed abstractions of image data, and provided access to supplementary non-image data. We also defined interactions for refining the search and visually indicating the similarities between images. We applied the UI for the retrieval of multi-modality positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) images. We conducted a user survey to evaluate the capabilities of our UI.

resultsOur proposed method obtained a high rating ( ≥ 4 out of 5) in the majority of survey questions. In particular, the survey responses indicated the UI presented all the information necessary to understand the retrieved images, and did so in an intuitive manner.

conclusionOur proposed UI design improved the ability of users to interpret and understand the similarity between retrieved PET-CT images. The implementation of CBIR UIs designed to assist human interpretation could facilitate wider adoption of medical CBIR systems.

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInformation Storage and RetrievalMultimodal ImagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.