GuidelineChest2013
Clinical and organizational factors in the initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
Guideline in Chest, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guideline
- Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2018Pooled it
- Guideline
- Trial
- Anlotinib for patients with small cell lung cancer and baseline liver metastases: A post hoc analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial.Cancer medicine · 2022Trial
- Characterization of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Machine Learning Tools: Relationship with Prognostic Biomarkers and Overall Survival-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy retreatment with serplulimab vs. chemotherapy in extensive-stage advanced small cell lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Anti-Hu-Associated Paraneoplastic Myeloneuropathy as the Initial Presentation of Early-Onset Colon Adenocarcinoma.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- The Rise and Fall of Interventional Pulmonology Procedures: Lessons in Innovation, Evidence, and Abandonment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Independent Predictors Associated with Patient Refusal of Invasive Diagnostic Procedures After Positive LDCT Lung Cancer Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- New therapies, new challenges: Cystic lung disease after cancer immunotherapy.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2026Article
- Atypical Interplay of Dermatomyositis, Metastatic Caecal Carcinoma, and Connective Tissue Disease.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Superior sulcus tumor with vertebral invasion following initial diagnosis of cavitary lung disease: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Beyond smoking status: risk factors for pulmonary nodules ≥5 mm in a Chinese community screening program.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Second Look at Refractory Edema: Delayed Diagnosis of Paraneoplastic Cushing's Syndrome in Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cureus · 2025Article
- Exosomal biomarkers and therapeutics in lung cancer: a narrative review on their role in early detection and targeted treatment.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Anti-Hu Paraneoplastic Polyradiculoneuropathy Masquerading As Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Endocrinology and the Lung: Exploring the Bidirectional Axis and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Beyond the tumor: towards a cachexia-based host phenotype through body composition analysis in patients with resectable lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis guideline is intended to provide an evidence-based approach to the initial evaluation of patients with known or suspected lung cancer. It also includes an assessment of the impact of timeliness of care and multidisciplinary teams on outcome.
methodsThe applicable current medical literature was identified by a computerized search and evaluated using standardized methods. Recommendations were framed using the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Data sources included MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
resultsInitial evaluation should include a thorough history and physical examination; CT imaging; pulmonary function tests; and hemoglobin, electrolyte, liver function, and calcium levels. Additional testing for distant metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes should be determined on the basis of these results. Paraneoplastic syndromes may have an adverse impact on cancer treatment, so they should be controlled rapidly with the goal of proceeding with definitive cancer treatment in a timely manner. Although the relationship between timeliness of care and survival is difficult to quantify, efforts to deliver timely care are reasonable and should be balanced with the need to attend to other dimensions of health-care quality (eg, safety, effectiveness, efficiency, equality, consistency with patient values and preferences). Quality care will require multiple disciplines. Although it is difficult to assess the impact, we suggest that a multidisciplinary team approach to care be used, particularly for patients requiring multimodality therapy.
conclusionsThe initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer should include a thorough history and physical examination, pulmonary function tests, CT imaging, basic laboratory tests, and selective testing for distant metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.